Publication Productivity and Promotion of Accounting Faculty Women: A Comparative Study

Omundson, Janet S.; Mann, Gary J.

doi:10.1080/08832323.1994.10117718

Cited by 16 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Women tend to follow, overwork and out-perform criteria for each role that is assigned to them (Chan, 1996;Mamiseishvili, 2010;Newall and Bradshaw, 1998;Omundson and Mann, 1994), yet "teaching, organizing, administrative duties and looking out for the welfare of 7 colleagues are less valued" (Bleijenbergh et al, 2012, p. 24). Women's workplace identity is lessened because their contribution is not rated as 'real' business (Haynes and Fearfull, 2008), and women's identification with the academic workplace will be negatively affected when their work is undervalued.…”

Section: The Value and Loss Of Workplace Identitymentioning

confidence: 99%

The symbolic meaning of artifacts for the workplace identity of women in academia

Kemp

Angell

McLoughlin

2015

Gender in Management: An International Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose – The aim of this paper is to investigate the symbolic meaning attributed by women in academia to workplace artifacts. Design/methodology/approach – The research approach is that of auto-ethnography, whereby the authors, as researchers and participants, explore symbolic meaning from artifacts in their working environment. Findings – Three themes emerged on the symbolic meaning from artifacts for women in academia. The theme of “affect” revealed women as uncomfortable in their surroundings; “representation”, renders women invisible within the institution; and women felt themselves to be under “surveillance”. Research limitations/implications – The investigation is limited to one university, which limits generalizability. The implication is to replicate this auto-ethnographical study in other institutions of higher education. Practical implications – This paper implies that architectural, institutional and personal artifacts play an important role in defining women’s workplace identity. Social implications – Women in academia identify themselves as “outsiders” in the workplace because of the symbolic meaning they attribute to artifacts. Originality/value – This study on women in academia is original as it is the first auto-ethnographical study on artifacts in an international institution of higher education.

show abstract

Section: The Value and Loss Of Workplace Identitymentioning

confidence: 99%

The symbolic meaning of artifacts for the workplace identity of women in academia

Kemp

Angell

McLoughlin

2015

Gender in Management: An International Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Only a few research studies have found an absence of gender differences in research productivity. These works either focus on specific disciplines and family-related factors [34], refer to non-Anglo-Saxon cultural contexts [35]- [36], take the quality and quantity of research output into consideration [37], or use criteria for productivity or academic advancement that limit the surveyed population [38]- [39]. In a recent paper, D'Amico, Vermigli and Canetto [40] emphasized the importance of considering cultural, academic, and social contexts when analyzing research productivity.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Vertical gender differences in Greek Economics Departments Does research productivity matters

Kotakou¹,

Zontanos²,

Katranidis³

2015

Second International Conference on Advances in Management, Economics and Social Science - MES 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigates possible vertical gender differences in the academic hierarchy related to the research performance and academic life of faculty members in the Economics departments of Greek Universities. The statistical analysis carried out confirms the existence of significant gender differences facing women in the academic hierarchy, with a relative overrepresentation of female faculty members in the two lower-non-tenured-academic ranks. This overrepresentation coincides with a longer academic life than that of men, suggesting a greater delay in their hierarchical advancement. Differences in research productivity and the quality of their research work cannot explain, statistically, this delay. The finding contradicts the outcomes of similar studies that deal with gender differences in research productivity, which have mainly been carried out in the Anglo-Saxon world. In addition, logistic regression analysis shows that research performance facilitates men's academic promotion to a higher rank, but not women's.

show abstract

“…We found eight such studies in fields as diverse as economics [16], strategic management [36], and several in accounting [35,42]. 4…”

Section: Studies Examining Whether Gender Is Associated With Promotiomentioning

confidence: 99%

Examining the relationship between gender and the research productivity of IS faculty

Gallivan

Benbunan‐Fich

2006

Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMIS CPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research: Forty Four Years of Computer Personnel Resear

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, we examine whether there exist gender differences between the rates of scholarly publications by IS researchers. Triggered, in part, by a recent study of so-called "top" IS researchers that featured just two women out of the leading 30 IS scholars [24], we sought to determine whether women IS scholars publish at rates similar to their male counterparts in the leading, scholarly IS journals. Using a different "basket" of 12 IS journals, our results showed that, of IS researchers who had published at least three papers in these journals, approximately 17% were women -a figure that is slightly less than the 21% of women IS faculty that we estimated. We also found that women comprised 13 of the Top 76 IS researchers for the period 1999-2003 (17%), and 42 of the top 251 IS scholars with three of more publications in these journals (16.7% women). Our study raises several implications for how to assess whether women have achieved equity in the IS academic field.

show abstract

Publication Productivity and Promotion of Accounting Faculty Women: A Comparative Study

Cited by 16 publications

References 2 publications

The symbolic meaning of artifacts for the workplace identity of women in academia

The symbolic meaning of artifacts for the workplace identity of women in academia

Vertical gender differences in Greek Economics Departments Does research productivity matters

Examining the relationship between gender and the research productivity of IS faculty

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About