Publication rate of abstracts from presentations at the British Orthodontic Conference 2009–2014

Al-Yatama, Fai; Pandis, Nikolaos; Cobourne, Martyn T.; Seehra, Jadbinder

doi:10.1177/1465312520944189

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Only 44% abstracts presented were published. Similar publication rates were reported by other studies [8,9]. Conference for the year 2014 was cancelled due to the unfortunate terrorist incident in a school in Peshawar.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 84%

Publication dynamics: what can be done to eliminate barriers to publishing full manuscripts by the postgraduate trainees of a low-middle income country?

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives This study aimed to determine the publication rate of free paper abstracts presented by the postgraduate (PG) trainees and determine the reasons for non-publication. A mixed methods study was conducted. PG trainees presenting free papers at the at the Pakistan Society of Chemical Pathologist conferences from 2012 to 2018 were included. Three databases were searched to identify if the abstracts were published or not. The PG trainee authors of abstracts not published as full manuscript, were surveyed to determine the barriers and challenges in publishing a manuscript. Results The average rate of full manuscript publication was 51.8% (n = 93/177) for the abstracts presented by the PG trainees. Publication rate was higher for oral (n = 73/119, 61.3%) compared to poster presentation (n = 20/58, 34.5%). Most of the manuscripts were published after two years of abstract presentation. The survey showed that the main challenges to publishing an abstract were lack of time, limited scientific writing or submission skills, lack of funding for publication fee, and negative or statistically non-significant results. This reflects a need to arrange workshops/symposia for the PG trainees of low-middle income country (LMIC) to enhance their writing and time management skills and improve the full manuscript publication rate from LMICs.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 84%

Publication dynamics: what can be done to eliminate barriers to publishing full manuscripts by the postgraduate trainees of a low-middle income country?

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This trend is irrespective of the patient population or whether the author was a pharmacy resident, and this observation is supported by similar publication rates seen in a 2021 study 35 . When compared with other health professionals, pharmacists have a lower abstract‐to‐publication conversion rate: the rate for physicians is approximately 47%, 36 while the rate for dentists is approximately 46% 37 . There are many factors that could be limiting the conversion of abstracts to full publication in pharmacy including lack of support and resources by the primary authors, faculty focus (research vs. clinical), funding, and author bias (including author gender) 38,39 …”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 55%

“…35 When compared with other health professionals, pharmacists have a lower abstract-to-publication conversion rate: the rate for physicians is approximately 47%, 36 while the rate for dentists is approximately 46%. 37 There are many factors that could be limiting the conversion of abstracts to full publication in pharmacy including lack of support and resources by the primary authors, faculty focus (research vs. clinical), funding, and author bias (including author gender). 38,39 Limitations of our scoping review include the predominance of abstracts included, which could prevent broad generalizations on pharmacy contributions to CF care.…”

Section: Study Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A scoping review of clinical pharmacist and pharmacy technician contributions to cystic fibrosis care

Kim,

Thompson,

Axon

et al. 2023

J Am Coll Clin Pharm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this scoping literature review was to assess available published literature and abstracts to examine described contributions by pharmacists and/or pharmacy technicians as part of care of people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF). This scoping review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA‐ScR). Published abstracts and articles from inception through December 2022 were included if they described care of pwCF (all ages), with at least one group of participants receiving care/services from pharmacy staff, and were available in English. Data extraction included outcomes, study, and participant characteristics. From 756 abstracts and papers, 91 were included. The majority were published abstracts (n = 67), from the United States (n = 64), retrospective cohort study design (n = 47), involved pharmacist intervention (n = 75), with no comparison group (n = 48), and in an outpatient/ambulatory setting (n = 59). Most often, literature were descriptions of specific pharmacist services, evaluations of adding a pharmacist, or descriptions of overall pharmacist practice/role. Specific pharmacist services included: patient or caregiver education, adherence support, medication reconciliation, management of pulmonary exacerbations, and medication management including monitoring, as well as telehealth. Pharmacists and pharmacy technicians have contributed to the care of pwCF in various ways; however, much of the available data is currently disseminated in the form of conference abstracts. Efforts to support author publication of data as full peer‐reviewed publications should be prioritized as this data can help support others' efforts to develop or support similar clinical pharmacy services.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

show abstract

“…Firstly, the systematic review included international conferences that feature specific medical disciplines, which tend to yield high publication rates. For instance, scientific conferences for specific fields such as head and neck oncology, paediatric orthopaedics, orthopaedic surgery, hand surgery, and orthodontics recorded publication rates that ranged between 30% to 60% [23][24][25][26][27]. The NCCR accepts abstracts from various disciplines and does not focus on a particular medical field.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Scientific Abstract to Full Paper: Publication Rate over a 3-Year Period in a Malaysian Clinical Research Conference

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The publication rates of abstracts after they were presented at the National Conference for Clinical Research (NCCR), a scientific conference held in Malaysia, was determined to gauge the scientific value of the conference, whilst providing comparative information with other scientific conferences. Methods: All the abstracts that were presented at the NCCR from 2014 to 2016 were analysed. Keywords from the abstract title, along with the first, second, and last author’s name, were searched via PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus to determine publication status. Results: A total of 320 abstracts were analysed. Of those, 57 abstracts (17.8%) were published. Almost 70% of published abstracts appeared in open access journals that charge article processing fees. Early publications (≤18 months from the conference date) had higher median journal impact factors compared to later publications. Approximately 42% of the published abstracts had collaborations with the Institute for Clinical Research (ICR) or Clinical Research Centres (CRCs). An increasing number of authors in an abstract and having the first author from a research centre, reduced and increased the odds of publication, respectively. Conclusions: The NCCR publication rate is lower compared to the reported average in other scientific conferences abroad. More encouragement and support to publish should be provided to the presenting authors. Clinicians should also be encouraged to collaborate with research centres such as those from the ICR or CRCs to boost publication likelihoods.

show abstract

Publication rate of abstracts from presentations at the British Orthodontic Conference 2009–2014

Cited by 4 publications

References 30 publications

Publication dynamics: what can be done to eliminate barriers to publishing full manuscripts by the postgraduate trainees of a low-middle income country?

Publication dynamics: what can be done to eliminate barriers to publishing full manuscripts by the postgraduate trainees of a low-middle income country?

A scoping review of clinical pharmacist and pharmacy technician contributions to cystic fibrosis care

Scientific Abstract to Full Paper: Publication Rate over a 3-Year Period in a Malaysian Clinical Research Conference

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About