Publication Rates of Presentations at an Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Donegan, Derek J.; Kim, Tae Won B.; Lee, Gwo-Chin

doi:10.1007/s11999-009-1171-5

Cited by 141 publications

(150 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

127

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…(4-7). In contrast, another study evaluating publication rate of the abstracts which have been presented at congresses organized by American Orthopedic Surgery Society reported that the publication possibility of the OP abstracts was similar to the publication possibility of the PP abstracts (52%-47%) (12).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 91%

Publication rates of abstracts presented at the annual congress of the Turkish Society of Colorectal Surgery (years 2003-2011)

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

INTRODUCTIONA scientific congress is an environment in which physicians with the same specialty and other health staff participate in, the results of which is shared as abstracts, and in which ideas are exchanged with one another. The abstracts presented in scientific congresses (oral/poster) are evaluated by the commissions that are assigned by the congress scientific committee during the preparation period of the congress and it is decided if the studies will be accepted in the congress or not.The publication of abstracts in national/international peer-reviewed journals after the congress is one of the indicators of the scientific value of the congress. In a Cochrane meta-analysis published in 2007, it was stated that the publication rate of the abstracts presented in a congress was 44.5% (1). Articles evaluating the conversion rate of the abstracts presented in international congresses into publications are limited. Similarly, the number of studies that are conducted in order to reveal the scientific efficiency of national congresses held in our country is also low. In these studies, it is reported that the conversion rate of the abstracts presented in the congresses to publications is very limited (between 5.7% and 28.6%) (2-7).Turkish Society of Colorectal Surgery (TSCRS) organizes periodic scientific activities in order to develop the professional, scientific and social relationships between its members in accordance with its aims. The congresses of TSCRS, which are organized once in two years, are one of the important scientific activities. In our study, we aimed to define the conversion rate of the abstracts presented in the congresses organized in 2003, 2007, 2009 and 2011 to articles in peer-reviewed journals, to determine the factors (presentation type, study type, congress year etc.) effecting publication rate. MATERIAL AND METHODSThe abstracts of oral presentations (OP) and poster presentations (PP) presented at the TSCRS congresses in

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 91%

Publication rates of abstracts presented at the annual congress of the Turkish Society of Colorectal Surgery (years 2003-2011)

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, Level III and IV presentations continued to outnumber those of high quality in 2010 (824 to 465). Donegen et al [7] reported that AAOS presentations have only a 49% publication rate in peer-reviewed journals after 5 years. Voleti et al [28] found that at 5 years.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Have Levels of Evidence Improved the Quality of Orthopaedic Research?

Cunningham

Harmsen

Kweon

et al. 2013

Clinical Orthopaedics &Amp; Related Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Since 2003 many orthopaedic journals have adopted grading systems for levels of evidence (LOE). It is unclear if the quality of orthopaedic literature has changed since LOE was introduced. Questions/purposes We asked three questions: (1) Have the overall number and proportion of Level I and II studies increased in the orthopaedic literature since the introduction of LOE? (2) Is a similar pattern seen in individual orthopaedic subspecialty journals? (3) What is the interobserver reliability of grading LOE? Methods We assigned LOE to therapeutic studies published in 2000, 2005, and 2010 in eight major orthopaedic subspecialty journals. Number and proportion of Level I and II publications were determined. Data were evaluated using log-linear models. Twenty-six reviewers (13 residents and 13 attendings) graded LOE of 20 blinded therapeutic articles from the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery for 2009. Interobserver agreement relative to the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery was assessed using a weighted kappa.

show abstract

“…[8,9] All data of the reports presented at the congress were obtained using the abstract book provided to the participants during the congress. All oral, poster discussions, and poster presentations accepted to the congress were included in the study.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

What fate befalls the congress proceedings? Conversion rates of National Thoracic Surgery Congress proceedings into international publications

Evman¹

2017

Turk Gogus Kalp Dama

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ÖZAmaç: Bu çalışmada, Ulusal Göğüs Cerrahisi Kongresi'nde sunulan bildirilerin takip eden dört yıl içinde bilimsel dergilerde yayına dönüştürülme oranları belirlendi ve Türkiye'de yayımlanan bu bildiri oranları ile ilişkili değişkenler incelendi. Çalışm a planı:PubMed veri tabanı kullanılarak, 2011 yılında VI. Ulusal Göğüs Cerrahisi Kongresi'nde sunulan ve uluslararası hakemli dergilerde ve Türk Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derneği ve Türk Göğüs Cerrahisi Derneği'nin resmi yayını Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi'nde yayımlanan yayınlar tespit edildi. Bildirinin türü, konu başlığı, birinci yazarın adı ve bağlı olduğu kurum, yayın süresi ve dergi adı geriye dönük olarak incelendi. Bul gu lar:Toplam 312 bildiriden 35'nin (%11.2) uluslararası hakemli dergilerde yayımlandığı bildirildi. Yirmi üç sözlü sunumun beşi (%21.7), 61 tartışmalı posterin 10'u (%16.3) ve 228 poster bildirisinin 20'si (%8.7) yayına dönüştürüldüğü görüldü. Sözel bildiriler, poster bildirilerine kıyasla daha fazla yayına dönüştürülmüştü; ancak istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark yoktu (p= 0.163). Kurum tipine göre en yüksek yayına dönüştürme oranı, üniversitelerden idi (%64.4); ancak üniversiteler, eğitim araştırma hastaneleri ve çok merkezli çalışmalar arasında kurum tipi açısından anlamlı bir fark yok idi (p= 0.581). Poster bildirilerin yayına dönüştürülme süresi, sözel bildirilere kıyasla, anlamlı düzeyde daha kısa idi (p= 0.005).Sonuç: Çalışma sonuçlarımız, kongre bildirilerinin hakemli dergilerde yayımlanma oranının %10 civarında olduğunu ve sözel bildirilerde ve üniversite kliniklerinde yapılan çalışmalarında bu oranın daha yüksek olduğunu göstermektedir.

show abstract

Publication Rates of Presentations at an Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Cited by 141 publications

References 13 publications

Publication rates of abstracts presented at the annual congress of the Turkish Society of Colorectal Surgery (years 2003-2011)

Publication rates of abstracts presented at the annual congress of the Turkish Society of Colorectal Surgery (years 2003-2011)

Have Levels of Evidence Improved the Quality of Orthopaedic Research?

What fate befalls the congress proceedings? Conversion rates of National Thoracic Surgery Congress proceedings into international publications

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About