Publications by Scandinavian university Departments of Anaesthesiology from 2001 to 2015

Miller, Clemens; Prenn, R.; Ausserer, Julia; Hamm, Peter; Neururer, Sabrina; Paal, Peter

doi:10.1111/aas.13149

Cited by 6 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Moreover, we showed that the number of publications from global anesthesia departments had a steady trend before 2004, but had an average annual growth rate that increased from 2.02 to 5.53% after 2004 ( Figure 2 ). These findings were similar to former bibliometric studies of clinical research from anesthesia departments of G-20 countries ( 19 ), European countries ( 20 , 21 ), and Scandinavian countries ( 22 ). Together with the subject-field's trend, the widening gap of publications between the two datasets was unveiled.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

“…Research activity of anesthesiology includes both clinical and basic studies. Distinct from the aforementioned studies on anesthesiology conducted on a subject-field basis, there were a few bibliometric studies on global clinical trials ( 18 ), as well as publication of clinical research from the G-20 countries ( 19 ), the European countries ( 20 , 21 ), Scandinavian countries ( 22 ), Canada ( 23 ), and East Asia ( 24 ), based on authors' affiliated departments. It is important to also inspect comprehensive department-based data, including all clinical and basic studies, in order to more thoroughly understand the overall condition of publications dealing with anesthesiology.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Academic Publication of Anesthesiology From a Bibliographic Perspective From 1999 to 2018: Comparative Analysis Using Subject-Field Dataset and Department Dataset

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Publication activity in the field of anesthesiology informs decisions that enhance academic advancement. Most previous bibliometric studies on anesthesiology examined data limited to journals focused on anesthesiology rather than data answerable to authors in anesthesia departments. This study comprehensively explored publication trends in the field of anesthesiology and their impact. We hypothesized that anesthesiology's bibliometric scene would differ based on whether articles in the same study period were published in anesthesiology-focused journals or were produced by authors in anesthesia departments but published in non-specialty journals.Methods: This cross-sectional study used bibliometric data from the Science Citation Index Expanded database between 1999 and 2018. Two datasets were assembled. The first dataset was a subject-dataset (articles published in 31 journals in the anesthesiology category of InCites Journal Citation Reports in 2018); the second dataset was the department-dataset (articles published in the Science Citation Index Expanded by authors in anesthesia departments). We captured the bibliographical record of each article in both datasets and noted each article's Institute for Scientific Information code, publication year, title, abstract, author addresses, subject category, and references for further study.Results: A total of 69,593 articles were published—cited 1,497,932 times—in the subject-dataset; a total of 167,501 articles were published—cited 3,731,540 times—in the department-dataset. The results demonstrate differences between the two datasets. First, the number of articles was stagnant, with little growth (average annual growth rate = 0.31%) in the subject-dataset; whereas there was stable growth (average annual growth rate = 4.50%) in articles in the department-dataset. Second, only 30.4% of anesthesia department articles were published in anesthesiology journals. Third, journals related to “pain” had the lowest department-subject ratio, which was attributable to a large portion of non-anesthesia department researchers' participation in related research.Conclusions: This study showed that articles published in anesthesiology-focused and non-specialty journals demonstrate fundamentally different trends. Thus, it not only helps researchers develop a more comprehensive understanding of the current publication status and trends in anesthesiology, but also provides a basis for national academic organizations to frame relevant anesthesiology development policies and rationalize resource allocation.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Academic Publication of Anesthesiology From a Bibliographic Perspective From 1999 to 2018: Comparative Analysis Using Subject-Field Dataset and Department Dataset

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…16 In the absence of numerous denominators, data have to be normalized as best as possible. 10,17 Normalization also takes into account that it is not possible to accurately capture the resources available to countries or institutions such as funding, infrastructure, legal requirements, or workforce. 17 It is therefore more useful to look at positions within a group or at trends based on previous numbers for a given unit.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, they also have limited validity, for example, due to a large temporal bias. 10 Since the quality of citations cannot be measured, the number of citations does not necessarily indicate the value of the research. The h-index incorporates bias from citation counts.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The pediatric anesthesiology publication activity and landscape over the past two decades: A longitudinal scientometric analysis

Miller,

Dejaco,

Gumz

et al. 2023

Pediatric Anesthesia

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundScientometric analyses characterize the output of research publications using quantitative methods. While it has been reported that the number of publications in anesthesiology has been increasing for years, the global research activity in pediatric anesthesiology and its landscape is largely unknown.AimsTo examine the activity, developmental dynamics, and collaboration landscape of research publications in pediatric anesthesiology over the past two decades.MethodsPubMed and WebOfScience were searched for pediatric anesthesiology publications published between 2001 and 2020. The identified publications were exported into a database, matched, curated, and then assigned to one or more countries according to their affiliation field(s). The primary outcome was the publication activity and its growth rate. Secondary outcomes included the geographical distribution, the evolution of international collaborations (as indicated by articles affiliated with more than one country), and the main sources.ResultsThirty‐four thousand, three hundred and forty‐three pediatric anesthesiology publications were retrieved. The compound annual growth rate over the study period was +7.6%. The highest annual growth rate was +20.6% from 2019 to 2020. Corresponding authors were most often affiliated with USA (32.5%), Germany (5.5%), and China (5.5%). China (+22.9%), Iran (+21.7%), and India (+16.1%) had the highest compound annual growth rates. 6001 (17.5%) articles involved international collaboration, with a compound annual growth rate of +13.1%. The most frequent collaboration was between USA and Canada (716 articles together). The most prominent source was Pediatric Anesthesia (10.0%).ConclusionsPublication activity in pediatric anesthesiology has increased from 2001 to 2020 and has become more geographically diverse. With the volume of international collaborations even outpacing this growth, it is hoped that this will gradually lead to a larger evidence base in pediatric anesthesia.

show abstract

Anästhesiologie-Publikationen aus Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz 2011–2015

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Publications by Scandinavian university Departments of Anaesthesiology from 2001 to 2015

Cited by 6 publications

References 14 publications

Academic Publication of Anesthesiology From a Bibliographic Perspective From 1999 to 2018: Comparative Analysis Using Subject-Field Dataset and Department Dataset

Academic Publication of Anesthesiology From a Bibliographic Perspective From 1999 to 2018: Comparative Analysis Using Subject-Field Dataset and Department Dataset

The pediatric anesthesiology publication activity and landscape over the past two decades: A longitudinal scientometric analysis

Anästhesiologie-Publikationen aus Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz 2011–2015

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About