2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-34168-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Publisher Correction: Massively parallel sequencing of cell-free DNA in plasma for detecting gynaecological tumour-associated copy number alteration

Abstract: A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML and PDF versions of this paper. The error has been fixed in the paper.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study using sequencing to analyze plasma cfDNA in patients with known cancers found evidence of abnormal cfDNA patterns in more than 80% of metastatic solid tumor cases and 50% of localized cancers . Our previous study also demonstrated that the incidence of copy number alterations (CNAs) is higher in advanced ovarian and uterine endometrial cancer than that in the corresponding early cancer; moreover, progression‐free survival and overall survival in cases with CNAs were shorter than those without CNAs . Thus, CNAs could be detected in a definite proportion of pregnant women with malignancies, and the alteration might affect the accuracy of NIPT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A recent study using sequencing to analyze plasma cfDNA in patients with known cancers found evidence of abnormal cfDNA patterns in more than 80% of metastatic solid tumor cases and 50% of localized cancers . Our previous study also demonstrated that the incidence of copy number alterations (CNAs) is higher in advanced ovarian and uterine endometrial cancer than that in the corresponding early cancer; moreover, progression‐free survival and overall survival in cases with CNAs were shorter than those without CNAs . Thus, CNAs could be detected in a definite proportion of pregnant women with malignancies, and the alteration might affect the accuracy of NIPT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%