2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41564-021-00863-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Publisher Correction: Quantitative image analysis of microbial communities with BiofilmQ

Abstract: A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-021-00863-6.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our classification results provide an automated alternative for experts to analyze different coated areas and provide additional inputs to the domain experts to further control their experimental parameters. Several tools have been employed to extract and evaluate the geometric properties of biofilm microstructures including deep neural network (Buetti-Dinh et al, 2019 ), BioFilm Analyzer (Bogachev et al, 2018 ), BiofilmQ (Hartmann et al, 2021 ), and ImageJ (Rueden et al, 2017 ). However, these tools characterize the smooth, homogeneous, and non-overlaying geometric structures and are not generic enough to classify the congested biofilm microstructures and byproducts as done in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our classification results provide an automated alternative for experts to analyze different coated areas and provide additional inputs to the domain experts to further control their experimental parameters. Several tools have been employed to extract and evaluate the geometric properties of biofilm microstructures including deep neural network (Buetti-Dinh et al, 2019 ), BioFilm Analyzer (Bogachev et al, 2018 ), BiofilmQ (Hartmann et al, 2021 ), and ImageJ (Rueden et al, 2017 ). However, these tools characterize the smooth, homogeneous, and non-overlaying geometric structures and are not generic enough to classify the congested biofilm microstructures and byproducts as done in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Images lacking sufficient resolution make it difficult for experts to manually detect certain class objects in such images with certainty. Tools such as BiofilmQ (Hartmann et al, 2021 ), ImageJ (Rueden et al, 2017 ) that have been used for microscopy image analyses are not effective in analyzing biofilm images where the class objects appear in bursts of high density and separating cells from clusters and byproducts is often ambiguous (Ragi et al, 2021 ). On the other hand, deep learning methods can be used to build models that can accurately and automatically detect each of the above three class objects in each image patch and these results can then be used to automatically build heatmaps depicting the distribution of these class objects in each image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Images of the biofilms were obtained on a Zeiss LSM 880 confocal microscope at 20× magnification for image generation and subsequent biofilm parameters analysis. Imaris (Oxford Instruments) was used to process the images, and BiofilmQ ( 90 ) was used to measure the global biofilm parameters of the biofilms that formed in each test condition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Z-stack images were captured from a total of 12 representative fields per mutant from three independent experiments. Images were analyzed using BiofilmQ ( 74 ). Global biofilm properties and individual microcolony measurements were calculated from preprocessed files with and without segmentation by cube dissection, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%