Publisher’s Note: Novel inclusive search for the Higgs boson in the four-lepton final state at CDF [Phys. Rev. D<b>86</b>, 072012 (2012)]

Aaltonen, T.; González, B. Alvarez; Amerio, S.; Amidei, D.; Anastassov, A.; Annovi, A.; Antos̆, J.; Apollinari, G.; Appel, J. A.; Arisawa, T.; Artikov, A.; Asaadi, J.; Ashmanskas, W.; Auerbach, B.; Aurisano, A.; Azfar, F.; Badgett, W.; Bae, T.; Barbaro-Galtieri, A.; Barnes, V. E.; Barnett, B. A.; Barria, P.; Bartoš, P.; Bauce, M.; Bedeschi, F.; Behari, S.; Bellettini, G.; Bellinger, J.; Benjamin, D.; Beretvas, A.; Bhatti, A.; Bisello, D.; Bizjak, I.; Bland, K. R.; Blumenfeld, B.; Bocci, A.; Bodek, A.; Bortoletto, D.; Boudreau, J.; Boveia, A.; Brigliadori, L.; Bromberg, C.; Brücken, E.; Budagov, J.; Budd, H. S.; Burkett, K.; Busetto, G.; Bussey, P.; Buzatu, A.; Calamba, A.; Calancha, C.; Camarda, S.; Campanelli, M.; Campbell, M.; Canelli, F.; Carls, B.; Carlsmith, D.; Carosi, R.; Carrillo, S.; Carron, S.; Casal, B.; Casarsa, M.; Castro, A.; Catastini, P.; Cauz, D.; Cavaliere, V.; Cavalli‐Sforza, M.; Cerri, A.; Cerrito, L.; Chen, Y. C.; Chertok, M.; Chiarelli, G.; Chlachidze, G.; Chlebana, F.; Cho, K.; Chokheli, D.; Chung, W. H.; Chung, Y. S.; Ciocci, Maria Agnese; Clark, A.; Clarke, C.; Compostella, G.; Convery, M. E.; Conway, J.; Corbo, M.; Cordelli, M.; Cox, C. A.; Cox, D. J.; Crescioli, F.; Cuevas, J.; Culbertson, R.; Dagenhart, D.; D’Ascenzo, N.; Datta, M.; Barbaro, P. de; Dell’Orso, M.; Demortier, L.; Deninno, M.; Devoto, F.; D’Errico, M.; Canto, A. Di; Ruzza, B. Di; Dittmann, J.; D’Onofrio, M.; Donati, S.; Dong, P.; Dorigo, M.; Dorigo, T.; Ebina, K.; Elagin, A.; Eppig, A.; Erbacher, R.; Errede, S.; Ershaidat, N.; Eusebi, R.; Farrington, S. M.; Feindt, M.; Fernandez, J.; Field, R. D.; Flanagan, G.; Forrest, R.; Frank, M. J.; Franklin, M.; Freeman, J.; Funakoshi, Y.; Furic, I. K.; Gallinaro, M.; Garcia, J. E.; Garfinkel, A. F.; Garosi, P.; Gerberich, H.; Gerchtein, E.; Giagu, S.; Giakoumopoulou, V.; Giannetti, P.; Gibson, K.; Ginsburg, C. M.; Giokaris, N.; Giromini, P.; Giurgiu, G.; Glagolev, V.; Glenzinski, D.; Gold, M.; Goldin, D.; Goldschmidt, N.; Golossanov, A.; Gómez, G.; Gómez-Ceballos, G.; Goncharov, M.; González, O.; Gorelov, I.; Goshaw, A. T.; Goulianos, K.; Grinstein, S.; Grosso-Pilcher, C.; Costa, J. Guimarães da; Hahn, S.; Halkiadakis, E.; Hamaguchi, A.; Han, J.; Happacher, F.; Hara, K.; Hare, D.; Hare, M.; Harr, R.; Hatakeyama, K.; Hays, C. P.; Heck, M.; Heinrich, J.; Herndon, M.; Hewamanage, S.; Höcker, A.; Hopkins, W. H.; Horn, D.; Hou, S.; Hughes, R. E.; Hurwitz, M.; Husemann, U.; Hussain, N.; Hussein, M.; Huston, J.; Introzzi, G.; Iori, M.; Ivanov, A.; James, E.; Jang, D.; Jayatilaka, B.; Jeon, E. J.; Jindariani, S.; Jones, Mark; Joo, K. K.; Jun, S. Y.; Junk, T. R.; Kamon, T.; Karchin, P. E.; Kasmi, A.; Kato, Y.; Ketchum, W.; Keung, J.; Khotilovich, V.; Kilminster, B.; Kim, D. H.; Kim, H. S.; Kim, J. E.; Kim, M. J.; Kim, S. B.; Kim, S. H.; Kim, Y. K.; Kim, Y. J.; Kimura, N.; Kirby, M.; Klimenko, S.; Knoepfel, K. J.; Kondo, K.; Kong, D. J.; Königsberg, J.; Kotwal, A.; Kreps, M.; Kroll, J.; Krop, D.; Kruse, M. C.; Krutelyov, V.; Kuhr, T.; Kurata, M.; Kwang, S.; Laasanen, A. T.; Lami, S.; Lammel, S.; Lancaster, M.; Lander, R.; Lannon, K.; Lath, A.; Latino, G.; LeCompte, T.; Lee, E.; Lee, H. S.; Lee, J. S.; Lee, S. W.; Leo, S.; Leone, S.; Lewis, J. D.; Limosani, A.; Lin, C.; Lindgren, M.; Lipeles, E.; Lister, A.; Litvintsev, D. O.; Liu, C.; Liu, H.; Liu, Q.; Liu, T.; Lockwitz, S.; Loginov, A.; Lucchesi, D.; Lueck, J.; Lujan, P.; Lukens, P.; Lungu, G.; Lys, J.; Lysák, R.; Madrak, R.; Maeshima, K.; Maestro, P.; Malik, S.; Manca, G.; Manousakis-Katsikakis, A.; Margaroli, F.; Marino, C.; Martı́nez, M.; Mastrandrea, P.; Matera, K.; Mattson, M. E.; Mazzacane, A.; Mazzanti, P.; McFarland, K. S.; McIntyre, P.; McNulty, R.; Mehta, A.; Mehtälä, P.; Mesropian, C.; Miao, T.; Mietlicki, D.; Mitra, A.; Miyake, H.; Moêd, S.; Moggi, N.; Mondragón, M. N.; Moon, C. S.; Moore, Richard W.; Morello, M. J.; Morlock, J.; Fernandez, P. Movilla; Mukherjee, A.; Müller, Th.; Murat, P.; Mussini, M.; Nachtman, J. M.; Nagai, Y.; Naganoma, J.; Nakano, I.; Napier, A.; Nett, J.; Neu, C.; Neubauer, M. S.; Nielsen, J.; Nodulman, L.; Noh, S. Y.; Norniella, O.; Oakes, L.; Oh, S. H.; Oh, Y. D.; Oksuzian, I.; Okusawa, T.; Orava, R.; Ortolan, L.; Griso, S. Pagan; Pagliarone, C.; Palencia, E.; Papadimitriou, V.; Paramonov, A.; Patrick, J.; Pauletta, G.; Paulini, M.; Paus, C.; Pellett, D.; Penzo, A.; Phillips, T. J.; Piacentino, G.; Pianori, E.; Pilot, J.; Pitts, K.; Plager, C.; Pondrom, L.; Poprocki, S.; Potamianos, K.; Prokoshin, F.; Pranko, A.; Ptohos, F.; Punzi, G.; Rahaman, A.; Ramakrishnan, V.; Ranjan, N.; Redondo, I.; Renton, P.; Rescigno, M.; Riddick, T.; Rimondi, F.; Ristori, L.; Robson, A.; Rodrigo, T.; Rodriguez, T.; Rogers, E.; Rolli, S.; Roser, R.; Ruffini, F.; Ruiz, A.; Russ, J.; Rusu, V.; Safonov, A.; Sakumoto, W. K.; Sakurai, Y.; Santi, L.; Sato, Kenta; Saveliev, V.; Savoy-Navarro, A.; Schlabach, P.; Schmidt, A.; Schmidt, E. E.; Schwarz, T.; Scodellaro, L.; Scribano, A.; Scuri, F.; Seidel, S. C.; Seiya, Y.; Semenov, A.; Sforza, F.; Shalhout, S.; Shears, T.; Shepard, P. F.; Shimojima, M.; Shochet, M.; Shreyber-Tecker, I.; Симоненко, А.; Sinervo, P.; Śliwa, K.; Smith, Jack; Snider, F. D.; Soha, A.; Sorı́n, V.; Song, H.; Squillacioti, P.; Stancari, M.; Denis, R. St.; Stelzer, B.; Stelzer-Chilton, O.; Stentz, D.; Strologas, J.; Strycker, G. L.; Sudo, Y.; Суханов, А.; Суслов, И.; Takemasa, K.; Takeuchi, Yuki; Tang, J.; Tecchio, M.; Teng, P. K.; Thom, J.; Thome, J.; Thompson, G. A.; Thomson, E.; Toback, D.; Tokár, S.; Tollefson, K.; Tomura, T.; Tonelli, D.; Torre, S.; Torretta, D.; Totaro, P.; Trovato, M.; Ukegawa, F.; Uozumi, S.; Varganov, A.; Vázquez, F.; Velev, G.; Vellidis, C.; Vidal, M.; Vila, I.; Vilar, R.; Vizán, J.; Vogel, M.; Volpi, G.; Wagner, P.; Wagner, R. L.; Wakisaka, T.; Wallny, R.; Wang, S. M.; Warburton, A.; Waters, D.; Wester, W. C.; Whiteson, D.; Wicklund, A. B.; Wicklund, E.; Wilbur, S.; Wick, F.; Williams, H. H.; Wilson, J. S.; Wilson, P.; Winer, B. L.; Wittich, P.; Wolbers, S.; Wolfe, H.; Wright, T.; Wu, X.; Wu, Z.; Yamamoto, K.; Yamato, D.; Yang, Tianyi; Yang, U. K.; Yang, Y.; Yao, W-M.; Yeh, G. P.; Yi, K.; Yoh, Jai-ick; Yorita, K.; Yoshida, T.; Yu, G. B.; Yu, Intae; Yu, S. S.; Yun, J. C.; Zanetti, A.; Zeng, Y.; Zhou, C.; Zucchelli, S.

doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.099902

Cited by 6 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…and the experimental data (41)-(44) and the top quark mass M T = 173.36 ± 0.72 GeV, that was computed in refs. [31] and [32], we find this function (see Figure 2). It was shown in [34] that the resulting minima and masses are relatively independent of the precise choice of the mass parameter M , as long as the potential (54) is used.…”

Section: Higgs Boson Masssupporting

confidence: 68%

SU(2/1) gauge-Higgs unification

Loginov

2016

Int. J. Mod. Phys. A

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We discuss a question whether the observed Weinberg angle and Higgs mass are calculable in the formalism based on a construction in which the electroweak gauge group $SU(2)\times U(1)_{Y}$ is embedded in the graded Lie group $SU(2/1)$. Here we follow original works of Ne'eman and Fairlie believing that bosonic fields take their values in the Lie superalgebra and fermionic fields take their values in its representation space. At the same time, our approach differs significantly. The main one is that while for them the gauge symmetry group is $SU(2/1)$, here we consider only symmetries generated by its even subgroup, i.e., symmetries of the standard electroweak model. The reason is that such formalism fixes the quartic Higgs coupling and at the same time removes the sign and statistics problems. The main result is that the presented model predicts values of the Weinberg angle and the Higgs mass correctly up to the two-loop level. Moreover, the model sets the unification scale coinciding with the electroweak scale and automatically describes the fermions correctly with the correct quark and lepton charges.Comment: 17 pages, 3 figure

show abstract

Section: Higgs Boson Masssupporting

confidence: 68%

SU(2/1) gauge-Higgs unification

Loginov

2016

Int. J. Mod. Phys. A

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…± 0.75 (syst.) GeV [3], and the combined LHC results at 7 TeV reach a total error of 1.4 GeV with 173.3 ± 0.5 (stat.) ± 1.3 (syst.)…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 80%

Top quark mass measurements at and above threshold at CLIC

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We present a study of the expected precision of the top quark mass determination, measured at a linear e + e − collider based on CLIC technology. GEANT4-based detector simulation and full event reconstruction including realistic physics and beam-induced background levels are used. Two different techniques to measure the top mass are studied: The direct reconstruction of the invariant mass of the top quark decay products and the measurement of the mass together with the strong coupling constant in a threshold scan, in both cases including first studies of expected systematic uncertainties. For the direct reconstruction, experimental uncertainties around 100 MeV are achieved, which are at present not matched by a theoretical understanding on a similar level. With a threshold scan, total uncertainties of around 100 MeV are achieved, including theoretical uncertainties in a well-defined top mass scheme. For the threshold scan, the precision at ILC is also studied to provide a comparison of the two linear collider technologies.

show abstract

“…The region of small transverse distances b T , on the other hand, is investigated via pertur-bative resummations to next-to-next-to-leading accuracy [29,[131][132][133] and computations through two loops [134][135][136][137][138] of the perturbative coefficient functions controlling the expansion of the TMDs in terms of collinear pdfs. All these aspects are relevant for the interpretation of the production spectra at low transverse momenta q T , both in high-energy Drell-Yan experiments at LHC and Tevatron [139][140][141][142][143][144][145] and in fixed-target experiments [146][147][148], including polarized Drell-Yan and semi-inclusive DIS [149,150].…”

Section: Theoretical Developments and Experimental Prospectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Transverse Momentum Dependent (TMD) Parton Distribution Functions: Status and Prospects

Ángeles-Martínez¹,

Bacchetta²,

Balitsky³

et al. 2015

Acta Phys. Pol. B

282

238

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

20 pagesInternational audienceWe provide a concise overview on transverse momentum dependent (TMD) parton distribution functions, their application to topical issues in high-energy physics phenomenology, and their theoretical connections with QCD resummation, evolution and factorization theorems. We illustrate the use of TMDs via examples of multi-scale problems in hadronic collisions. These include transverse momentum q_T spectra of Higgs and vector bosons for low q_T, and azimuthal correlations in the production of multiple jets associated with heavy bosons at large jet masses. We discuss computational tools for TMDs, and present an application of a new tool, TMDlib, to parton density fits and parameterizations

show abstract

Publisher’s Note: Novel inclusive search for the Higgs boson in the four-lepton final state at CDF [Phys. Rev. D86, 072012 (2012)]

Cited by 6 publications

References 19 publications

SU(2/1) gauge-Higgs unification

SU(2/1) gauge-Higgs unification

Top quark mass measurements at and above threshold at CLIC

Transverse Momentum Dependent (TMD) Parton Distribution Functions: Status and Prospects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About