2014
DOI: 10.2305/iucn.ch.2014.parks-20-2.ta.en
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Publishing for the protected area community: A vision for PARKS from its Editorial Board

Abstract: In this editorial essay, members of the Editorial Board of PARKS review the status of conservation literature. Three problems are identified: 1) the growing gap between the formal conservation literature and the so-called 'grey literature' of project reports, studies and working papers; 2) the effectiveness of the majority of conservation literature in promoting good conservation; and 3) the lack of open access to much of the conservation literature currently available. The article sets out the vision of this … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Debate about the influence and role of peer-reviewed literature in conservation (Amend et al, 2014) is taking place against a backdrop of dramatic evolution in scientific journal publication. Much discussion has focused on the relationship between published research and conservation practice, and whether new, open access journals will supplant the role of the more traditional society journals despite the respected history of the latter in nurturing the study of conservation science and curating its literature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Debate about the influence and role of peer-reviewed literature in conservation (Amend et al, 2014) is taking place against a backdrop of dramatic evolution in scientific journal publication. Much discussion has focused on the relationship between published research and conservation practice, and whether new, open access journals will supplant the role of the more traditional society journals despite the respected history of the latter in nurturing the study of conservation science and curating its literature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%