Publishing Information Systems Action Research for a Positivist Audience

Abstract

Action research is particularly valuable for its ability to inform theory while making a practical difference. Special issues of MISQ in 2004 and Information Technology and People in 2001 called attention both to action research and research methodology. Yet action research is not widely disseminated across the information systems discipline.The purpose of this tutorial is to advance information systems action research and serve researchers, practitioners, and reviewers by addressing the dissemination problem. We consider how an action research project and the resulting article can widen its appeal to information systems scholars in two ways. First, by clarifying the information systems research paradigm vocabulary of epistemology, methodology, and the action research approach. And second, we outline an article structure more familiar to positivist researchers, thereby creating a bridge among IS scholars to a largely positivist audience. This tutorial is based on the experiences of the authors as information systems action researchers.Editor's Note: This tutorial was developed based on a presentation made at AMCIS 2005.

Design and Behavioral Science Research in Premier IS Journals: Evidence from Database Management Research

“…We also classify the articles in terms of the research methodologies used. We include the classification on research methods in our study because research methods represent "the means for gaining knowledge" and "may be used with any epistemological perspective" [12]. Past studies (e.g., [1,16,48]) have identified several research methods that are commonly used in IS research.…”

Enhancing STEM equity programs with action research

“…However, tensions sometimes exist between those who practice action research and those who practice traditional scientific inquiry (e.g. DeLuca & Kock, 2007). Similarly, some educators may view action research that values multi-disciplinary collaboration as incompatible with the dominant silo-based structures of most universities (Greenwood, 2012).…”

Diversity or Identity Crisis? An Examination of Leading IS Journals

“…The present results show that each conceptualization of IT was examined using a variety of methods and demonstrate the methodological rigor used to pursue these questions. DeLuca and Kock [2007] argue that relying on only one research method can lead to misunderstandings or incorrect conclusions. In addition to the primary research method, in most cases two or more methods were used in the research studied.…”