Publishing Registered Reports in Management and Applied Psychology: Common Beliefs and Best Practices

Abstract

Management and applied psychology scholars are confronted with a crisis undermining trust in their findings. One solution to this crisis is the publication format Registered Reports (RRs). Here, authors submit the frontend of their paper for peer review before data collection. While this format can help increase the trustworthiness of research, authors’ usage of RRs—although emerging—has been scarce and scattered. Eventually, common beliefs regarding the (dis)advantages of RRs and a lack of best practices can limit the broad implementation of this approach. To address these issues, we utilized a systematic review process to identify 50 RRs in management and applied psychology and surveyed authors with ( N = 86) and without experience ( N = 161) in publishing RRs and reviewers/editors who have handled RRs ( N = 59). On this basis, we (a) scrutinize prevalent beliefs surrounding the RR format in the fields of management and applied psychology and (b) derive hands-on best practices. In sum, we provide a fact check and guidelines for authors interested in writing RRs, which can also be used by reviewers to evaluate such submissions.

Trade credits and visit frequency: The role of order financing on logistics efficiency in the nanostore setting

“…Given the complexity, efforts, and expenses associated with field experiments, the Pre-Approved Research Design for Field Experiments process as designed by Journal of Operations Management also helped to increase the process efficiency, i.e., provide for the best possible outcome given the research budgets and the operational complexities of the empirical context. Our experience echoes that of other authors across multiple research domains, who expressed a supportive and collaborative review process when executing Registered Reports (Briker & Gerpott, 2023). Hence, we encourage journal editors across the Operations Management domain to develop quality control and quality improvement processes for field experiments by incorporating Registered Reports within their journals' portfolios.…”

It’s time to join the conversation: Visions of the Future for Qualitative Transparency and Openness in Management and Organisation Studies

“…Furthermore, new formats of publication can also facilitate transparent reporting. Management journals are increasingly welcoming 'Registered Reports', which allow scholars to submit the beginning of their paper for peer review prior to data collection to improve transparency and reduce so-called 'questionable research practices' (Briker & Gerpott, 2023). National research systems are also ushering in changes, for example In addition to discussions of transparency of methods, our participants highlighted that they valued practices that could improve the dissemination of their research to broader audiences, primarily around open-access publishing.…”