2007
DOI: 10.1590/s1677-55382007000600010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pudendal somatosensory evoked potentials in normal women

Abstract: The SSEP latency represents an accessible and reproducible method to investigate the afferent pathways from the genitourinary tract. These results could be used as normative values in studies involving genitourinary neuropathies in order to better clarify voiding and sexual dysfunctions in females.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other factors such as high body mass index could contribute to LUT symptoms, especially urgency and stress incontinence, although this was not analysed. However, body mass index has not been shown to impact pelvic neurophysiology findings [23]. Matching with a control cohort would have increased the strength of the study; however, the design of our study precluded this possibility as pelvic neurophysiology is not performed routinely in the absence of suspected nerve lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other factors such as high body mass index could contribute to LUT symptoms, especially urgency and stress incontinence, although this was not analysed. However, body mass index has not been shown to impact pelvic neurophysiology findings [23]. Matching with a control cohort would have increased the strength of the study; however, the design of our study precluded this possibility as pelvic neurophysiology is not performed routinely in the absence of suspected nerve lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The S2 and S3 dermatomal SEP responses were abnormal if absent, or if the inter‐side latency difference was >4.5 ms, or there was >50% inter‐side difference in amplitude [21, 22]. Incidental abnormalities have not been reported in healthy women [23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%