2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00366-020-01146-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pull-in and freestanding instability of actuated functionally graded nanobeams including surface and stiffening effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gurtin and Murdoch ([23,24]) proposed a surface elasticity theory to approximate the contribution of surface energy by assuming an elastic body with elastic surface layers of zero thickness that is perfectly bonded to the surface of the bulk continuum. The Gurtin and Murdoch surface elasticity theory (GM-SET) has been successfully employed in conjunction with the other nonclassical continuum theories in the analysis of homogeneous and one-dimensional FG structures, i.e., GM-SET combined with the DNET ( [47][48][49]), GM-SET combined with the SGT ( [50]), GM-SET combined with the DNSGT ( [51]), GM-SET combined with the MCST ( [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64]), and GM-SET combined with the MCST in the framework of DNET ( [65,66]). Based on these studies, it has been shown that incorporating the influence of surface energy may show a stiffness-hardening or stiffness-softening of the studied nanostructures depending on whether the signs of the surface elastic constants are positive or negative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gurtin and Murdoch ([23,24]) proposed a surface elasticity theory to approximate the contribution of surface energy by assuming an elastic body with elastic surface layers of zero thickness that is perfectly bonded to the surface of the bulk continuum. The Gurtin and Murdoch surface elasticity theory (GM-SET) has been successfully employed in conjunction with the other nonclassical continuum theories in the analysis of homogeneous and one-dimensional FG structures, i.e., GM-SET combined with the DNET ( [47][48][49]), GM-SET combined with the SGT ( [50]), GM-SET combined with the DNSGT ( [51]), GM-SET combined with the MCST ( [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64]), and GM-SET combined with the MCST in the framework of DNET ( [65,66]). Based on these studies, it has been shown that incorporating the influence of surface energy may show a stiffness-hardening or stiffness-softening of the studied nanostructures depending on whether the signs of the surface elastic constants are positive or negative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If not properly addressed, these issues have the potential to adversely affect the system's performance and even destroy the stability of the whole system. As a result, various control approaches have been proposed in the literature to overcome these issues [1][2][3]. These approaches can be classified into intelligent methods, classical approaches and combination of both.…”
Section: Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following conditions should be satisfied:3-a |d(x, t)| + |x k (t)| < ρ where ρ is a positive constant.3-b There exist continuous and positive-definite functions ν and μ such that:ℓ 1 ‖x‖ 2 < ν(x) < ℓ 2 ‖x‖ 2 , ℓ 3 ‖x‖ 2 < μ(x) < ℓ 4 ‖x‖2 where x = (x 1 , . .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal and magnetic fields have been considered in the solution. Furthermore, there are some important papers related to static and dynamic analyses of FG beams [22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%