2002
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.2001.8126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pull-off Force Measurements between Rough Surfaces by Atomic Force Microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
146
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
146
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, we refer to Section 7.2. Yet some theoretical results [351][352][353][354] are generally valid, also for usual AFM-tips on rough samples. The surface energy of polar materials has been the object of several theoretical and experimental works in the past few years.…”
Section: Determination Of Hamaker Constants Adhesion and Surface Enementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, we refer to Section 7.2. Yet some theoretical results [351][352][353][354] are generally valid, also for usual AFM-tips on rough samples. The surface energy of polar materials has been the object of several theoretical and experimental works in the past few years.…”
Section: Determination Of Hamaker Constants Adhesion and Surface Enementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model was found to adequately describe the decrease in adhesion for increasing roughness on titanium deposited on silicon wafers [557]. Beach et al [352] applied this model successfully to analyze pull-off forces of glass and lactose particles from rough surfaces (series of polypropylene coatings, polycarbonate, and acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene). The adhesion of beclomethasone dipropionate and polystyrene particles to polypropylene was underestimated by about an order of magnitude.…”
Section: Influence Of Roughness On Adhesionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elasticity (Davies et al, 2005;Perkins et al, 2009Perkins et al, , 2007 Deformation (local) Hardness (Masterson and Cao, 2008;Perkins et al, 2009) Degradation during storage or processing (Perkins et al, 2009) Force distance measurements Elastic modulus Elasticity (Davies et al, 2005;Perkins et al, 2009, 2007 Hardness (Masterson and Cao, 2008;Perkins et al, 2009) Adhesion Degradation during storage or processing (Perkins et al, 2009) Crystallinity (Perkins et al, 2007) Particle surface energetics (Davies et al, 2005;Perkins et al, 2009) Chemical surface properties (Hooton et al, 2004) Correlation of surface specific properties (Perkins et al, 2007;Ward et al, 2005) Colloidal probe AFM Adhesion Physical interaction between materials (Beach et al, 2002;Hooton et al, 2004;Rogueda et al, 2011) Chemical interaction between materials (Hooton et al, 2004;Islam et al, 2014;Rogueda et al, 2011) Cohesive adhesive balance (Begat et al, 2004a;Jones et al, 2008a,b) Particle surface energetics (Hooton et al, 2006a) Electrostatic surface properties (Götzinger and Peukert, 2003;Kwek et al, 2011) Triboelectric charging (Kwek et al, 2011) Surface polarity (Kwek et al, 2011) Fig. 1.…”
Section: Phase Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All methods are based on an ideally smooth surface even though the impact of morphology and roughness is generally acknowledged and investigated (Beach et al, 2002). Increased surface roughness leads to a decrease in contact area as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Roughness and Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation