1994
DOI: 10.1016/0010-4361(94)90215-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pull-out testing of carbon/bismaleimide systems in the temperature range 20–250°C

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To illustrate this, we considered several polymer-ber pairs tested using the microbond and pull-out tests, both from our own experiments and from the literature, where all required properties of bers and matrices have been quoted [3,7,28,29]. The same datasets were already analyzed by us using the stress-based approach [17], and some of them were treated using frictionless stress-based and energy-based analyses in Ref.…”
Section: Treatment Of Experimental Data: Separate Determination Of G mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate this, we considered several polymer-ber pairs tested using the microbond and pull-out tests, both from our own experiments and from the literature, where all required properties of bers and matrices have been quoted [3,7,28,29]. The same datasets were already analyzed by us using the stress-based approach [17], and some of them were treated using frictionless stress-based and energy-based analyses in Ref.…”
Section: Treatment Of Experimental Data: Separate Determination Of G mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The s app parameter is sufficient for qualitative estimation of the interfacial bond strength and for comparative study of different interfaces (obtained, for instance, using surface modification of the fiber and/or the matrix), when mechanical properties of both components and the test geometry remain unchanged. However, numerous experiments have shown that the apparent IFSS depends on the embedded length [4][5][6]14,18,20,[23][24][25][26][27]. Moreover, the s app values have been found to be highly affected by interfacial friction between the fiber and the matrix which develops during the debonding process [9,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34]; thus, s app appeared to represent a complex combined effect of interfacial bonding and friction rather than pure bond strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These techniques have been shown to be relatively simple, reproducible and very sensitive to the state of the interface, e.g., to various fiber surface treatments [5,6,[19][20][21][22][23]. They are based on the measurement of the force, F max , required to pull out a single fiber with one end embedded in a droplet of the matrix material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measuring IFSS between fiber and matrix requires several micromechanical techniques. Some of the most frequently used techniques include the single-fiber microdroplet test (also called the single-fiber pullout test) (1)(2)(3), the fragmentation test (also called the single-fiber composites (SFC) test) (4)(5)(6), and the microindentation method 1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. (7), which is usually used for brittle ceramic matrix composites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%