2016
DOI: 10.1002/mma.3762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pullback attractors of 2D Navier–Stokes equations with weak damping, distributed delay, and continuous delay

Abstract: In this present paper, the existence of pullback attractors for the 2D Navier-Stokes equation with weak damping, distributed delay, and continuous delay has been considered, by virtue of classical Galerkin's method, we derived the existence and uniqueness of global weak and strong solutions. Using the Aubin-Lions lemma and some energy estimate in the Banach space with delay, we obtained the uniform bounded and existence of uniform pullback absorbing ball for the solution semi-processes; we concluded the pullba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2,5,6,[22][23][24][25][26] It is worth pointing out that there is no paper studying the stochastic delayed p-Laplacian equation, although other delayed equations had been well investigated. 16,17,[27][28][29][30][31][32] For Equation (3) even for the simpler cases such as deterministic equation (b j = 0) or bounded domain, it has not been solved for the existence (let alone backward compactness) of a pullback attractor in X = C([− , 0], X), where X = L 2 (R n ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,5,6,[22][23][24][25][26] It is worth pointing out that there is no paper studying the stochastic delayed p-Laplacian equation, although other delayed equations had been well investigated. 16,17,[27][28][29][30][31][32] For Equation (3) even for the simpler cases such as deterministic equation (b j = 0) or bounded domain, it has not been solved for the existence (let alone backward compactness) of a pullback attractor in X = C([− , 0], X), where X = L 2 (R n ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%