2014
DOI: 10.3934/cpaa.2014.13.1141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pullback exponential attractors for evolution processes in Banach spaces: Properties and applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In what follows, As an application to Theorem 3, we examine the asymptotic behavior of a new version of non-autonomous Chafee-Infante equation respecting the new assumption (12). Some other versions of this equation in stronger spaces have arisen in [5], [3], [2] and [7]. In [3], the unperturbed version of the following equation has been studied and the trivial asymptotic dynamics has been shown when λ < 1.…”
Section: Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In what follows, As an application to Theorem 3, we examine the asymptotic behavior of a new version of non-autonomous Chafee-Infante equation respecting the new assumption (12). Some other versions of this equation in stronger spaces have arisen in [5], [3], [2] and [7]. In [3], the unperturbed version of the following equation has been studied and the trivial asymptotic dynamics has been shown when λ < 1.…”
Section: Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider the problem (1) on a bounded, smooth and convex domain Ω with the assumptions (2)-(5) and(12) and let {A (t) : t ∈ R} be the pullback global attractor in L 2 (Ω) associated to it. If diam(Ω) < π(c 5 + α2 ) −1 , then A (t) = {u(t)} where u is a global solution of the problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We notice that the evolution mode of states in a random system is, in some sense, similar to the deterministic non-autonomous one and there were several construction methods to obtain a pullback exponential attractor for a (deterministic) process, see [14,15,16,17,20,35,61]. We also notice that a trajectory of a random system is often unbounded in time along the path of sample point with probability 1 which is different from deterministic one [14,15,16,17,20,35,61]. Thus, in general, a simple straightforward extension from deterministic system to random system does not work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In [9] non-autonomous exponential attractors were constructed for discrete time evolution processes based on the notion of uniform attractors. Subsequently, the method has been generalised for continuous time processes applying the weaker concept of pullback attractors (see [4], [5], [6], [12]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%