2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10706-007-9129-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pullout resistance of single vertical shallow helical and plate anchors in sand

Abstract: This paper presents analytical models to predict the pullout capacity and the load-displacement relationship for shallow single vertical helical and plate anchors in sand. The models were developed based on the failure mechanism deduced from laboratory testing and utilize the limit equilibrium technique. Expression was given to estimate the critical depth for a given anchor/soil conditions, which separates deep from shallow anchors. Furthermore, the radius of influence of a individual anchor on the ground surf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The anchor uplift capacity is derived from the equilibrium of a rigid soil body delineated by a given failure surface. At shallow depths, the failure surface is a soil wedge reaching the surface, whose boundary may be assumed to be a straight line, either vertical or inclined, (Meyerhof and Adams 1968, Ghaly et al 1991, Giampa et al 2017 or a log-spiral (Murray and Geddes 1987, Saeedy 1987, Hanna et al 2007 propagating from the plate to the soil surface ( Figure 1Figure 1). At greater depths, a flow around mechanism has been proposed, consisting of a deep wedge that does not reach the ground surface (Meyerhof andAdams 1968, Ghaly et al 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anchor uplift capacity is derived from the equilibrium of a rigid soil body delineated by a given failure surface. At shallow depths, the failure surface is a soil wedge reaching the surface, whose boundary may be assumed to be a straight line, either vertical or inclined, (Meyerhof and Adams 1968, Ghaly et al 1991, Giampa et al 2017 or a log-spiral (Murray and Geddes 1987, Saeedy 1987, Hanna et al 2007 propagating from the plate to the soil surface ( Figure 1Figure 1). At greater depths, a flow around mechanism has been proposed, consisting of a deep wedge that does not reach the ground surface (Meyerhof andAdams 1968, Ghaly et al 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The small difference (2 mm) between the lengths of the box and the plate eliminated the friction between these two elements during the uplift. The boundary effects were reduced considering the fact that the depth of embedment of the plate was shallow (H/B < 1·5) (Hanna et al, 2007) and also because the affected area at the surface of the embedment was limited to a small area compared with the total width of the box.…”
Section: Geotechnical Research Volume 3 Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hanna et al (2007) investigated the load-displacement curve derived by Ghaly et al (1991) in model tests. A hyperbolic curve was adopted to fit the measured result, which is Equation 1:…”
Section: The Function Fitting Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%