2023
DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01239-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulmonary endarterectomy in patients with occlusive isolated pulmonary vasculitis

Jiexu Ma,
Wu Song,
Hang Xu
et al.

Abstract: Background Isolated pulmonary vasculitis (IPV) is a rare, insidious, and localized inflammatory disease affecting the pulmonary arteries, often leading to severe luminal obstruction. The prognosis for patients with occlusive IPV is poor, and there is currently a lack of effective treatments. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) as a treatment for occlusive IPV. Methods This single-center retr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, CT imaging revealed partially recanalized pulmonary arteries and there were multiple perfusion defects in her V/Q scan. Although successfully treated cases with primary pulmonary vasculitis were reported by PEA, 6,7 data about TAK patients with Group IV PH is scarce. There are two case reports in the literature; one died shortly after the operation due to heart failure, 8 and the other improved symptomatically and functionally, although this report lacks hemodynamic and V/Q scan evaluation after PEA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, CT imaging revealed partially recanalized pulmonary arteries and there were multiple perfusion defects in her V/Q scan. Although successfully treated cases with primary pulmonary vasculitis were reported by PEA, 6,7 data about TAK patients with Group IV PH is scarce. There are two case reports in the literature; one died shortly after the operation due to heart failure, 8 and the other improved symptomatically and functionally, although this report lacks hemodynamic and V/Q scan evaluation after PEA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%