@ERSpublicationsA step forward in the diagnosis of pulmonary vascular disease in patients with left heart failure http://ow.ly/kR47300mzcfIn this issue of the European Respiratory Journal (ERJ), GERGES et al. [1] propose an interesting refinement of the diagnosis of pulmonary vascular disease in patients with left heart failure. The problem is of importance. Left heart disease with increased pulmonary venous pressure, abbreviated as LHD in recent reviews and guidelines, is by far the most common cause of pulmonary hypertension (PH) [2][3][4]. Furthermore, up to 80% of patients with heart failure with preserved or reduced ejection fraction and/or mitral or aortic valve diseases are exposed to the eventual development of PH with associated worsened symptomology and decreased survival [2][3][4]. Accordingly, the diagnosis of PH-LHD was a focus of attention at the World PH Symposium held in Nice in 2013. Experts agreed on the following updated invasive haemodynamic criteria of PH-LHD: a mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) ⩾25 mmHg and a pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) >15 mmHg to define post-capillary PH, with a gradient between diastolic PAP and PAWP, or diastolic pressure gradient (DPG) ⩾7 mmHg and/or a pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) >3 Wood units (WU) to identify a pre-capillary component added to the passive upstream transmission of PAWP. New acronyms were introduced: Ipc-PH for isolated post-capillary PH with normal or minimally increased DPG and PVR, and Cpc-PH for combined pre-and post-capillary PH with definitely increased DPG and/or PVR [2-4].GERGES et al.[1] implemented these criteria in an in-depth analysis of a database of 1506 patients diagnosed with PH-LHD. Their analysis convincingly shows that the combination of a DPG ⩾7 mmHg and (instead of and/or) a PVR >3 WU provides a greater specificity for the Cpc-PH phenotype. Tightened criteria decreased the prevalence of pulmonary vascular disease in LHD by 42% in their patient population. This difference is not trivial. GERGES and co-workers [5,6] had previously shown that Cpc-PH as a complication of heart failure with or without preserved ejection fraction, or increased risk of pulmonary vascular disease in these patients is associated with more severe PH, worse functional class, more commonly altered right ventricular function and decreased survival, when compared with Ipc-PH.The debate about the best combination of measurements to predict morphological changes in the pulmonary circulation is not new. When COURNAND et al. [7] reported in 1945 the first cardiac catheterisation of a patient, who happened to suffer from severe PH on mitral stenosis, the histopathology of this form of PH-LHD had already been extensively described [8]. Obviously, increased PAP was to be accounted for by remodelling and obstruction of pulmonary resistive vessels. However, progress of cardiac surgery to correct for increased pulmonary venous pressure (mitral stenosis) or high pulmonary flow (left-to-right cardiac shunts) as causes of severe PH soon requested more ...