IntroductIon.Effective strategies for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are widely available, but remain underused, especially in Brazil. objectIve. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of implementing a guideline for VTE prophylaxis for surgical patients on the behavior of the health care staff regarding prophylaxis for patients submitted to orthopedic or abdominal surgery. Methods. This was a retrospective pre-intervention/post-intervention study. The charts of 150 patients before (BGI) and 150 ones after guideline implementation (AGI) were selected at random from all patients over the age of 40 admitted for major abdominal or orthopedic surgery. Data registered: demographic data, reference to VTE risk factors in chart, VTE prophylaxis prescription, VTE diagnosis during hospitalization. results. There was no difference between BGI and AGI in terms of demographic data and duration of prophylaxis (5.6 x 6.6 days). Frequency of BGI versus AGI prophylaxis before surgery was: pharmacological prophylaxis (PP), 6% versus 9%; graduated compression stockings (GCS), 4% versus 3%; intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC), 2% versus 3%. After surgery: PP, 53% versus 53%; GCS, 23% versus 40% (p < 0.05); IPC, 26% versus 32%. Including all patients, prophylaxis was prescribed for 60.5% of patients BGI and 66.5% AGI, but it was considered adequate for 34% of patients BGI and 32% AGI. conclusIon. Adoption of the guideline, despite the greater concern with prophylaxis, as expressed by higher rates of prescription of GCS, provided only minimal quality improvements, indicating that other active and continuous interventions are needed to increase compliance.