1983
DOI: 10.1016/0041-008x(83)90318-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulmonary toxicity of inhaled coal liquid aerosols (boiling range 230–450°C)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

1984
1984
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although pigmented material of HD origin was not observed in lung sections, the pulmonary al veo 1 ar macrophage response observed was compatible with the effects reported for another inhalation study using a coal-tar aerosol (McConnell and Specht, 1973). The lung response in our anlmals was less pronounced than and qualitatively different from those observed in guinea pigs exposed for a shorter period of time (3 weeks) to a similar boiling-range material obtained from the SRC-I process (Loscutoff et al, 1983). This may represent a species difference in lung response or a difference in toxicity due to differences in chemical composition of the two coal liquids.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although pigmented material of HD origin was not observed in lung sections, the pulmonary al veo 1 ar macrophage response observed was compatible with the effects reported for another inhalation study using a coal-tar aerosol (McConnell and Specht, 1973). The lung response in our anlmals was less pronounced than and qualitatively different from those observed in guinea pigs exposed for a shorter period of time (3 weeks) to a similar boiling-range material obtained from the SRC-I process (Loscutoff et al, 1983). This may represent a species difference in lung response or a difference in toxicity due to differences in chemical composition of the two coal liquids.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…Target concentrations, as indicated by previous work (Springer et al, l982b;Loscutoff et al, 1983) (Springer et al, 1981). Mean daily concentrations of the aerosol from each chamber was determined by collecting triplicate samples at three equal intervals throughout the 6-hour exposure period.…”
Section: Exposure Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%