2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.11.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulmonary Vein Reconnection No Longer Occurs in the Majority of Patients After a Single Pulmonary Vein Isolation Procedure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
83
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
10
83
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past, during repeat procedures, the reported PVR rate was very high reaching rates of 65–95% [7,8]. These PVR rates have now dropped to ∼22–38% [5,6,[8], [9], [10]], although exceptions have been reported where PVR rate remains high (62.5%) despite use of newer technology (contact-force RF ablation) [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, during repeat procedures, the reported PVR rate was very high reaching rates of 65–95% [7,8]. These PVR rates have now dropped to ∼22–38% [5,6,[8], [9], [10]], although exceptions have been reported where PVR rate remains high (62.5%) despite use of newer technology (contact-force RF ablation) [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recently published CLOSE protocol made extreme efforts regarding delivery of constant energy and force with sufficient duration in contiguous lesions, and their excellent efficacy has already been proven in both animal and clinical studies [8][9][10]. The VISITAG ™ is a fundamental component of such point-by-point approaches, as it objectively demonstrates the gaps in the line that are inadequately ablated regions associated with future reconnections [11]. Therefore, the analysis of the gaps in our study is clinically important, as it could reveal the missing points in our practice and ultimately enhance outcomes after the procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of contemporary RF catheter ablation technologies has significantly decreased both re-ablation following first PVI and PV reconnection rates at second PVI procedure, as demonstrated in two large, single-center studies [28,29]. A recent study confirmed that PV reconnection did not occur in the majority of patients after a single PVI procedure using STAI and the ''CLOSE'' protocol [30]. These findings may help to explain the results of our analysis which show a significantly lower 12-month recurrence rate after ablation for PAF than has previously been reported [21,22].…”
Section: Impact Of New Rf Lesion-quality Markersmentioning
confidence: 96%