2019
DOI: 10.1177/2324709619840375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulmonary Veno-Occlusive Disease: A Rare Cause of Pulmonary Hypertension

Abstract: Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) is a rare entity that is usually mistaken with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) but is considered class I′ of PAH. It is important to subclassify PVOD and distinguish it from PAH as treatment with vasodilators in PVOD patients is controversial and may be fatal. In this article, we describe a case of PVOD and how we diagnosed it.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A systematic review of the role of alkylating agents in the development of pulmonary hypertension published in 2015 established that alkylating agents, including cyclophosphamide, are a risk factor for the development of pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD), and exposure to cyclophosphamide leads to pulmonary venous remodeling in experimental models which, in turn, develops pulmonary hypertension [ 6 ]. PVOD is extremely rare, with its incidence being 0.1 to 0.2 cases per million every year [ 7 ], and clinically very difficult to differentiate from PAH. The gold standard for diagnosis of PAH is right heart catheterization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic review of the role of alkylating agents in the development of pulmonary hypertension published in 2015 established that alkylating agents, including cyclophosphamide, are a risk factor for the development of pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD), and exposure to cyclophosphamide leads to pulmonary venous remodeling in experimental models which, in turn, develops pulmonary hypertension [ 6 ]. PVOD is extremely rare, with its incidence being 0.1 to 0.2 cases per million every year [ 7 ], and clinically very difficult to differentiate from PAH. The gold standard for diagnosis of PAH is right heart catheterization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PVOD was first described by Julius Hora in the 1930s and later distinguished from IPAH in 1966 by Heath et al [ 2 , 3 ]. Due to its rarity and the lack of effective treatment options, PVOD is classified as an orphan lung disease, with an estimated prevalence of 1–2 cases per million inhabitants [ 3 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical findings that should alert the clinician to the potential diagnosis of PVOD include high supplemental oxygen requirements, pulmonary oedema during vasoreactivity testing and a poor response to PAH targeted therapies. Relevant investigations that may also suggest the diagnosis include severe reductions in T LCO , <50% of predicted values, mediastinal adenopathy with associated septal line thickening and centrilobular ground glass opacities on computed tomography, and occult haemorrhage on bronchoalveolar lavage [ 2 , 3 , 10 ]. Interestingly RHC is not helpful to differentiate PVOD from other causes of Group 1 PAH, as it typically demonstrates a precapillary pattern, even though the principle anatomical abnormality is located on the postcapillary side.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) is a fatal lung disease characterized by diffused occlusion of postcapillary pulmonary venules, intimal thickening and smooth muscle hypertrophy [1]. Clinically, PVOD shares disease phenotype with other forms of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), such as idiopathic PAH [2] or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension [3]. Vasodilating therapeutics may cause life threatening pulmonary edema in PVOD [4], which necessitates differentiating it from other PAH types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%