2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-024-1292-5_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulsar-Wind Nebulae and Magnetar Outflows: Observations at Radio, X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Wavelengths

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 175 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, the association of FRB 121102 with a persistent radio source has been used to argue that the radio bursts are produced by a young magnetar powering a luminous wind nebula 13,48 . This model is not well motivated by Galactic examples, since the most luminous (non-magnetar powered) Galactic pulsar wind nebula is only 2 × 10 −6 times as luminous as the persistent source coincident with FRB 121102, and Galactic magnetars have no detectable persistent radio wind nebulae 49,50 . Also, while giant flares from magnetars can produce relativistic outflows 51 , an upper limit on the RM from one such outburst 52 is 4 orders of magnitude below that observed for FRB 121102.…”
Section: Constraints On the Properties Of The Faraday Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, the association of FRB 121102 with a persistent radio source has been used to argue that the radio bursts are produced by a young magnetar powering a luminous wind nebula 13,48 . This model is not well motivated by Galactic examples, since the most luminous (non-magnetar powered) Galactic pulsar wind nebula is only 2 × 10 −6 times as luminous as the persistent source coincident with FRB 121102, and Galactic magnetars have no detectable persistent radio wind nebulae 49,50 . Also, while giant flares from magnetars can produce relativistic outflows 51 , an upper limit on the RM from one such outburst 52 is 4 orders of magnitude below that observed for FRB 121102.…”
Section: Constraints On the Properties Of The Faraday Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flaring from the reverse shock could lead to additional (lower-energy) γ-ray emission, and the interaction between the GRB and the ejecta could lead to broadband afterglow emission lasting days to weeks (Kulkarni et al, 2015;Murase et al, 2016;Lyutikov and Lorimer, 2016). The quasisteady nebular emission of the magnetar wind nebula itself may be difficult to detect (Murase et al, 2016;Reynolds et al, 2017). X-rays are able to penetrate the ejecta, but only on a 100 year timescale, and are therefore unlikely to be detected (Margalit et al, 2018).…”
Section: Magnetar Wind Bubble (Clustered Flaresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The panels are numbered in accordance with tables 1 and 2. Chandra images of some of these objects are also shown in Reynolds et al (2017). morphologies (cf.…”
Section: Magnetic Fields and Related Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The white arrows show the directions of pulsar proper motion, and the green arrow shows the bending in the Lighthouse Nebula outflow (inset). Chandra images of some of these objects are also shown in Reynolds et al (2017). can be estimated as γ ∼ 2 × 10 8 (E/1 keV) 1/2 (B ISM /5 µG) −1/2 , where B ISM is the ambient magnetic field, and E is the synchrotron photon energy that reaches at least 8 keV for the Lighthouse, Guitar and J1509-5058 PWNe.…”
Section: Misaligned Outflowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation