2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/embc.2017.8036809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulse arrival time (PAT) measurement based on arm ECG and finger PPG signals - comparison of PPG feature detection methods for PAT calculation

Abstract: In this study, pulse arrival time (PAT) was measured using a simple measurement setup consisting of arm electrocardiogram (ECG) and finger photoplethysmogram (PPG). Four methods to calculate PAT from the measured signals were evaluated. PAT was calculated as the time delay between ECG R peak and one of the following points in the PPG waveform: peak (maximum value of PPG waveform), foot (minimum value of PPG waveform), dpeak (maximum value of the first derivative of PPG waveform) and ddpeak (maximum value of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the ECG signal, the PPG waveform is smooth and it is not characterized by a clearly detectable feature (Rajala et al, 2017). Hence, an important first step for PRV analysis is the accurate detection of the PPG pulse wave and pulse periods (PP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the ECG signal, the PPG waveform is smooth and it is not characterized by a clearly detectable feature (Rajala et al, 2017). Hence, an important first step for PRV analysis is the accurate detection of the PPG pulse wave and pulse periods (PP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ECG and PPG signals were filtered with a high pass filter of 0.5 Hz cut-off frequency to remove the baseline and later filtered with 60 Hz notch filter to remove the power line noise [11]. Since PPG signals are significantly vulnerable to physiological (e.g., respiration, head tilt) and measurement (e.g., motion) oriented artifacts [15], [16], PPG signals were later filtered again with a low pass filter of cut off frequency of 10 Hz [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though PPG foot is the conventional and mostly used point for PAT calculation [22], [23], there are studies which used other points for PAT calculation as well. For example, Chua and Heneghan used ECG R-peak and the point with the highest gradient on the upward edge of the PPG for PAT calculation [24], Baek et al used PPG first derivative [25], Rajala et al used PPG peak, foot, first and second derivative [11], PPG peak, foot, 20% height, and the maximum first derivative was used by another group [26]. As stated earlier, we tried to use three known measures for PAT calculation, but in this study, we only focused on PPG peaks derived PAT because of its easy detection and less intersubject variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations