2021
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2021.3079571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulse Deinterleaving for Multifunction Radars With Hierarchical Deep Neural Networks

Abstract: Multi-function radars (MFR) work with pulse groups, and pulses in different groups are weakly correlated, which greatly increases the difficulty for MFR pulse deinterleaving, especially in cases of significant data noises. At present, no relevant research results have been reported to address this problem. In this paper, a hierarchical deep learning model will be established to describe the sequential patterns of pulse trains from MFR's. The bottom layer of the model represents discrete pulse groups with conti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the extensive use of radar signals in recent years, various types of interference and signal parameter spatial overlap phenomena have increased, creating a complex electromagnetic environment around the radar signal [1]. Signals in a complex environment are specifically characterized by certain measurement errors, more lost pulses, and false pulses, and these characteristics greatly interfere with the signals [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the extensive use of radar signals in recent years, various types of interference and signal parameter spatial overlap phenomena have increased, creating a complex electromagnetic environment around the radar signal [1]. Signals in a complex environment are specifically characterized by certain measurement errors, more lost pulses, and false pulses, and these characteristics greatly interfere with the signals [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three main categories of deinterleaving methods: PRI‐based methods [10–18], machine learning (ML) methods based on clustering [19–33], and deep learning (DL)‐based methods [8, 34–42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three main categories of deinterleaving methods: PRI-based methods [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18], machine learning (ML) methods based on clustering [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33], and deep learning (DL)-based methods [8,[34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the typical de-interleaving algorithms described above, other types of signal de-interleaving algorithms have also been proposed, including signal de-interleaving algorithms based on square sine wave interpolation [21,22], signal de-interleaving algorithms based on sequence correlation [23][24][25], and signal de-interleaving algorithms based on machine learning [26][27][28][29]. In 2007, Jiang et al proposed a square sine wave interpolation algorithm [21], estimating PRI with high accuracy, speed, and anti-pulse loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%