1980
DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(80)81090-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulse fluorimetric study of labelled actin—DNase I complex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The time constants of the anisotropy decay for the slow component were approximately 20 ns and changed with OEG linker length only slightly ( θ 2 in Table 2 ), and the anisotropy decay amplitude ( r 1 and r 2 ) noticeably changed with OEG linker length. The time constants of anisotropy decay that were previously reported were somewhat longer than our result of 20 ns: 30 ns for G-actin labeled with dansyl or 5- ({2-[(iodoacetyl)amino]ethyl}amino)naphthalene-1-sulfonic acid (IAEDANS) at 25°C [ 30 ], 45.5 ns for G-actin labeled with IAEDANS at 25°C [ 31 ], and 27.53 ns and 30.43 ns for Ca- and Mg-G-actin, respectively, with IAEDANS at 22.7°C [ 32 ]. The difference of these time constants from the present value may have occurred, probably because these studies used the zero-time anisotropy during the analyses in different manners as the present study and the use of a low zero-time anisotropy value in the least squares fitting often tends to yield a longer time constant.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…The time constants of the anisotropy decay for the slow component were approximately 20 ns and changed with OEG linker length only slightly ( θ 2 in Table 2 ), and the anisotropy decay amplitude ( r 1 and r 2 ) noticeably changed with OEG linker length. The time constants of anisotropy decay that were previously reported were somewhat longer than our result of 20 ns: 30 ns for G-actin labeled with dansyl or 5- ({2-[(iodoacetyl)amino]ethyl}amino)naphthalene-1-sulfonic acid (IAEDANS) at 25°C [ 30 ], 45.5 ns for G-actin labeled with IAEDANS at 25°C [ 31 ], and 27.53 ns and 30.43 ns for Ca- and Mg-G-actin, respectively, with IAEDANS at 22.7°C [ 32 ]. The difference of these time constants from the present value may have occurred, probably because these studies used the zero-time anisotropy during the analyses in different manners as the present study and the use of a low zero-time anisotropy value in the least squares fitting often tends to yield a longer time constant.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…The slides were triple-labeled for DNA by using 15 ,uM Hoechst 33258 (20), for p185 by using the TAl antibody (21) directly conjugated to Texas red, and for p300 by using the M344 mouse monoclonal antibody (17) and a three-stage sequence using biotin-conjugated goat antibody to mouse IgGl as secondary antibody and fluorescein-labeled avidin (22). With 14 of the tumors and 5 of the controls a second triple-labeled slide was prepared, labeling for DNA as above, for EGFR by using AB-1 mouse monoclonal antibody (Oncogene Science) and the same visualization system as was used with M344, and for G-actin by using DNase I (Molecular Probes) directly conjugated to Texas red (23). A corresponding negative control slide omitting primary antibodies was also prepared.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%