2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulse-modulation eddy current probes for imaging of external corrosion in nonmagnetic pipes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on ETREE modeling for transient eddy current inspection [11], the closed-form expression of z -component of the net magnetic field at an arbitrary position in Region II can be written as:Bz(r,z,t)=4μ0τI(t)Λ(r,z,t)=4μ0τI(t)IFT[Λ(r,z,ω)] where ⊗ denotes circular convolution; μ 0 is the vacuum permeability; I ( t ) stands for the PMEC excitation current signal whose expression can be found in Reference [10]; τ is the density of the coil winding, τ = N [ H ( r 2 − r 1 )] −1 , where N is the number of turns of the excitation coil; and Λ( r , z , t ) is the function depicting the field response to the conductor when the ferrite-cored excitation coil is driven by the impulse current in the Dirac delta function of time. This can be readily computed with its spectral form Λ( r , z , ω ) in conjunction with the Inverse Fourier Transform (IFT) [25]. Note that in Equation (1), ω denotes the angular frequency of each harmonic within the PMEC excitation current.…”
Section: Field Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on ETREE modeling for transient eddy current inspection [11], the closed-form expression of z -component of the net magnetic field at an arbitrary position in Region II can be written as:Bz(r,z,t)=4μ0τI(t)Λ(r,z,t)=4μ0τI(t)IFT[Λ(r,z,ω)] where ⊗ denotes circular convolution; μ 0 is the vacuum permeability; I ( t ) stands for the PMEC excitation current signal whose expression can be found in Reference [10]; τ is the density of the coil winding, τ = N [ H ( r 2 − r 1 )] −1 , where N is the number of turns of the excitation coil; and Λ( r , z , t ) is the function depicting the field response to the conductor when the ferrite-cored excitation coil is driven by the impulse current in the Dirac delta function of time. This can be readily computed with its spectral form Λ( r , z , ω ) in conjunction with the Inverse Fourier Transform (IFT) [25]. Note that in Equation (1), ω denotes the angular frequency of each harmonic within the PMEC excitation current.…”
Section: Field Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current in the pulse modulation waveform for driving the excitation coil is shown in Figure 2. The frequencies of the carrier wave ( f c = 800 Hz) and modulation waves ( f m = 80 Hz) of the current waveform are chosen as per the rule of thumb elaborated in References [10] and [25]. During simulations, in an attempt to simulate the cases with flawed specimens, for the thickness loss in the clad layer, d 1 varies whilst d 2 is fixed.…”
Section: Simulations and Investigation Regarding Loi Of Pmec Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the analytical modeling is applicable for fast and accurate solutions to the related electromagnetic quantities. In light of this, a 3D hybrid model integrating the analytical modeling i.e., the Extended Truncated Region Eigenfunction Expansion (ETREE) modeling for solving electromagnetic problems [ 16 , 17 , 18 ] with 3D FEM for simulations of the ultrasonic field [ 8 ] is proposed. The schematic illustration of the 3D hybrid model is portrayed in Figure 2 .…”
Section: 3d Hybrid Model Of the Proposed Transducermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that in Equations (1) and (2) ζ mn ( t ) denotes the time-domain expression of the conductor reflection coefficient [ 8 , 21 ]. It can be readily computed via inverse Fourier transform of its time-harmonic form ζ mn ( ω ), where, ω denotes the angular frequency of each harmonic in the spectrum of the excitation current [ 22 ]. For a two-layer conductor comprising an upper layer with the finite thickness d and a bottom layer with infinite thickness (as shown in Figure 2 ), ζ mn ( ω ) can be written as: where, , i = 1, 2. σ i and μ i denote the conductivity and relative permeability of each layer, respectively.…”
Section: Field Formulation and Investigation Of Uniform Field Charmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, in the presence of the subsurface corrosion the plate thickness decreases with Δ d from the back surface. By referring to [ 8 , 21 , 22 ], the response of x -component of the net magnetic field B x to the initial subsurface corrosion with Δ d →0 is written as: where, ζ ′ mn ( t ) can be readily recovered via the inverse Fourier transform of ∂[ ζ mn ( ω )]/∂ d which is formulated as: …”
Section: Field Formulation and Investigation Of Uniform Field Charmentioning
confidence: 99%