Pulse oximetry in paediatric dentistry

Shindova, Maria; Belcheva, Ani; Taralov, Zdravko

doi:10.3897/folmed.64.e69136

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The level of anxiety was assessed using pulse oximetry to evaluate the children's heart rate (Shindova et al, 2022). In this study, heart rate was measured at three intervals: 1-First time: before starting any procedure (Before behavior management).…”

Section: Level Of Anxietymentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness of the tell-play-do technique in comparison to the tell-show-do technique for the management of anxious children: A randomized controlled trial

Ibrahim

El-Taweil

Mahmoud

et al. 2023

Advanced Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the tell-play-do technique compared to the tell-showdo technique in managing anxious children. Methodology: Thirty-four children aged 4-6 years were included in the current study. Children were randomly assigned to intervention (Tell-play-do technique) and control groups (Tell-show-do technique). The level of dental anxiety was assessed using a finger pulse oximeter at three intervals during the procedure. The operator evaluated the child's behavior during the procedure in each group using the FLACC (Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability) behavioral pain assessment scale. The ease of handling the patient (during the procedure) and the ease of carrying out the procedure by the pediatric dentist after using the two behavior modification techniques were assessed by using a questionnaire. Results: After behavior management and at the end of the visit, the control group had a significantly higher heart rate than the intervention group (p=0.016 and p <0.001), respectively. Behavior evaluation results reported a significant difference between both groups (p<0.001). Both groups had a significant difference (p<0.001) regarding the ease of handling patients and the ease of doing the procedure in favor of the intervention group. Conclusion: Tell-play-do technique was more successful than the Tellshow-do technique in reducing the children's anxiety. Most of the children in the tell-play-do group were relaxed and comfortable compared to those in the tell-show-do group, which showed mild discomfort. The tell-play-do group revealed better results regarding the ease of handling the patient and the ease of doing the procedure by the operator.

show abstract

Section: Level Of Anxietymentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness of the tell-play-do technique in comparison to the tell-show-do technique for the management of anxious children: A randomized controlled trial

Ibrahim

El-Taweil

Mahmoud

et al. 2023

Advanced Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Effectiveness of virtual reality distraction interventions to reduce dental anxiety in paediatric patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Yan

Cao

et al. 2023

Journal of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Motion resistance in peripheral oxygen saturation monitoring using Biolight Analog SpO2 compared to Masimo SpO2: a non-inferiority study

Yang,

Liu,

Cai

et al. 2024

BMC Anesthesiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Pulse oximeters are vital for assessing blood oxygen levels but can produce inaccurate readings during patient motion, leading to false alarms and alarm fatigue. Analog SpO2 Technology, which uses analog waveforms to filter motion artifacts, may improve accuracy compared to digital sensors. However, the effectiveness of this technology in reducing false alarms in clinical settings remains unclear. This study assesses and compares the motion resistance of Analog SpO2 Technology of two devices in the market. Methods Thirty healthy adults underwent controlled experiments (Control, Linear Motion, Angular Motion) using two pulse oximeters. Linear Motion tested hand displacement impact, while Angular Motion involved rhythmic hand motions at 120 bpm and 160 bpm. Results Both devices performed similarly in Control, with no disruptions. In Linear Motion, mild disruptions occurred, but no significant differences in SpO2 readings or alarms. Angular Motion at 120 bpm showed stability with no alarms. At 160 bpm, Device B (Biolight Analog SpO2) had fewer technical alarms but more SpO2 alarms than Device A (Masimo Analog SpO2). Conclusions Analog SpO2 exhibited motion resistance under static, linear and continuous waving angular motion up to 120 bpm and 160 bpm, but alarms occurred at 160 bpm with continuous tapping angular motion. These findings signify non-inferiority of either device in clinical settings. Further studies should include patients with cardiovascular and/or respiratory diseases. Trial Registration The study was submitted to and approved by the Biolight Ethics Committee (S0723), and written informed consent from all participants was obtained.

show abstract

Pulse oximetry in paediatric dentistry

Cited by 5 publications

References 26 publications

Effectiveness of the tell-play-do technique in comparison to the tell-show-do technique for the management of anxious children: A randomized controlled trial

Effectiveness of the tell-play-do technique in comparison to the tell-show-do technique for the management of anxious children: A randomized controlled trial

Effectiveness of virtual reality distraction interventions to reduce dental anxiety in paediatric patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Motion resistance in peripheral oxygen saturation monitoring using Biolight Analog SpO2 compared to Masimo SpO2: a non-inferiority study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About