2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.95.241307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulse sequences for suppressing leakage in single-qubit gate operations

Abstract: Many realizations of solid-state qubits involve couplings to leakage states lying outside the computational subspace, posing a threat to high-fidelity quantum gate operations. Mitigating leakage errors is especially challenging when the coupling strength is unknown, e.g., when it is caused by noise. Here we show that simple pulse sequences can be used to strongly suppress leakage errors for a qubit embedded in a three-level system. As an example, we apply our scheme to the recently proposed charge quadrupole (… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the main questions to be answered in this work is whether phonon-mediated noise presents a challenge for charge quadrupole qubits, and how phonon-induced decoherence compares to decoherence from charge noise, which was studied in [31,32]. Similar to [32], we assume the charge noise to be quasistatic, with fluctuations of the dipolar detuning parameter that follow a Gaussian distribution with a standard deviation of 1 μeV [58], as typical for experiments. A composite Z X Z 3 p p p -( ) ( ) ( ) pulse sequence was implemented, to eliminate the effects of leakage to leading order, and the average gate fidelity was calculated as described in [32].…”
Section: Qubit Fidelitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…One of the main questions to be answered in this work is whether phonon-mediated noise presents a challenge for charge quadrupole qubits, and how phonon-induced decoherence compares to decoherence from charge noise, which was studied in [31,32]. Similar to [32], we assume the charge noise to be quasistatic, with fluctuations of the dipolar detuning parameter that follow a Gaussian distribution with a standard deviation of 1 μeV [58], as typical for experiments. A composite Z X Z 3 p p p -( ) ( ) ( ) pulse sequence was implemented, to eliminate the effects of leakage to leading order, and the average gate fidelity was calculated as described in [32].…”
Section: Qubit Fidelitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to [32], we assume the charge noise to be quasistatic, with fluctuations of the dipolar detuning parameter that follow a Gaussian distribution with a standard deviation of 1 μeV [58], as typical for experiments. A composite Z X Z 3 p p p -( ) ( ) ( ) pulse sequence was implemented, to eliminate the effects of leakage to leading order, and the average gate fidelity was calculated as described in [32]. The pulse sequence used in these simulations is shown in figure 6, with additional details given in appendix G. For the phonon noise, we use the same pulse sequence.…”
Section: Qubit Fidelitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations