2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbj.2016.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy effectiveness in low back pain: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Thus, there is still a demand for new approaches, less invasive and unlikely to provide side effects. 7 In this sense, the pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) therapy can play an important role in pain relief since it is a drug-free, nonthermal, with low risk that works to enhance cellular activity healing and repair. 6 Therefore, it could be an option to the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) medication, avoiding several potential side-effects from chronic NSAIDs usage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Thus, there is still a demand for new approaches, less invasive and unlikely to provide side effects. 7 In this sense, the pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) therapy can play an important role in pain relief since it is a drug-free, nonthermal, with low risk that works to enhance cellular activity healing and repair. 6 Therefore, it could be an option to the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) medication, avoiding several potential side-effects from chronic NSAIDs usage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their systematic review of randomized studies, Andrade et al [11] confirmed that the PEMF treatment causes pain relief and functional improvement in patients with low back pain. Hence, they reported the PEMF treatment as a potential alternative to pharmacological pain treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, PEMF therapy has shown other beneficial effects, including reduction of acute and chronic pain associated with connective tissue (tendon, ligaments, bone, and cartilage) injury as well as edema and inflammation control and wound healing [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the mentioned studies used small number sample sizes (16–40 patients) 44. Some of these studies did not do any follow-up after the conclusion of the interventions or did a follow-up for a short period 45. Finally, the six studies used different machines producing different magnetic field intensity and frequency and different treatment protocols.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%