2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulsed laser deposition of a ZnO:Eu3+ thin film: Study of the luminescence and surface state under electron beam irradiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Zn 2p peaks are identified at 1021 and 1044 eV corresponding to the doublet of Zn 2p (Zn 2p 3/2 and Zn 2p 1/2 and their exact binding energy values are noted in the figure). These doublets maintained the intensity ratios of 2:1 and the binding energy difference was observed as 23 eV which matches with the reported values of zinc peaks in zinc oxide samples [4] , [10] , [28] . In the case of cobalt high-resolution spectra, according to the increase in Co 2 O 3 concentration, the spectra appeared with lesser noise.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The Zn 2p peaks are identified at 1021 and 1044 eV corresponding to the doublet of Zn 2p (Zn 2p 3/2 and Zn 2p 1/2 and their exact binding energy values are noted in the figure). These doublets maintained the intensity ratios of 2:1 and the binding energy difference was observed as 23 eV which matches with the reported values of zinc peaks in zinc oxide samples [4] , [10] , [28] . In the case of cobalt high-resolution spectra, according to the increase in Co 2 O 3 concentration, the spectra appeared with lesser noise.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…As a result, it was further revealed from the results of XPS analysis that the MIP shell was successfully encapsulated onto the surface of SiO 2 @Y 2 O 3 :(Eu 3+ ,Tb 3+ ). What is more, we found that the binding energy of all these elements did not change, according to information described in previous publications, [23,24] indicating no reciprocal binding reaction among each element of phosphor and silica.…”
Section: Xps Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The difference between the binding energies of Eu 3d 3/2 and Eu 3d 5/2 for all alkali metal ion-contained phosphors is 29.9 eV, irrespective of the alkali metal ions used. This con rms that Eu ions in Ca 2.82 (PO 4 ) 2 :0.09Eu 3+ , 0.09M + phosphors exist as Eu 3+ ions[42,43].…”
supporting
confidence: 69%
“…2 :0.09Eu 3+ , 0.09M + (M = Li, Na, and K) phosphors are obtained, as shown in Fig.7. The binding energies of Eu 3d 3/2 peaks for Ca 2.82 (PO 4 ) 2 :0.09Eu 3+ phosphor and Li + -, Na + -, and K + -doped phosphors are 1164.9, 1165.1, 1164.9, and 1164.7 eV, respectively, and those of Eu 3d 5/2 are 1135.0, 1135.2, 1135.0, and 1134.8 eV, respectively[42,43].…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%