2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2016.01.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulsed lasers versus continuous light sources in capillary electrophoresis and fluorescence detection studies: Photodegradation pathways and models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different aspects of LIF detection in CE (light sources, detection elements, optimization of excitation conditions, photostability of the fluorophores, spectral filtering, and fluorescent labels) including the possibilities to further improve the LODs of on‐capillary LIF detectors were in detail analyzed in the tutorial article . Comparison of the pulsed lasers and continuous light sources have shown that continuous lasers and LEDs are more suitable for LIF detection in CE since they provide linear calibration curves, whereas pulsed lasers give polynomial ones . The nonlinearity is caused by photodegradation and photodimerization of fluorescently labeled analytes.…”
Section: Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different aspects of LIF detection in CE (light sources, detection elements, optimization of excitation conditions, photostability of the fluorophores, spectral filtering, and fluorescent labels) including the possibilities to further improve the LODs of on‐capillary LIF detectors were in detail analyzed in the tutorial article . Comparison of the pulsed lasers and continuous light sources have shown that continuous lasers and LEDs are more suitable for LIF detection in CE since they provide linear calibration curves, whereas pulsed lasers give polynomial ones . The nonlinearity is caused by photodegradation and photodimerization of fluorescently labeled analytes.…”
Section: Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The photodegradation induced by pulsed UV‐LIF was investigated, explaining the non‐linear quantification using pulsed light. The main processes involved are the high photodegradation yield due to the very high pulse powers (> 800 W) and the dimerization of aromatic molecules resulting from different molecules that do or do not fluoresce .…”
Section: Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These UV lasers increase the selectivity of the detection because only Trp, Tyr and Phe can emit fluorescence upon 266 nm excitation. But the use of this kind of laser is problematic because the very high instant light power degrades the aromatic molecules, limiting the linearity of the detection . Moreover, it not possible to identify the non‐aromatic AA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%