2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulsed Radiofrequency Versus Continuous Radiofrequency for Facet Joint Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many centers apply these procedures to manage sacral pain. Publications on this issue have been collectively reviewed 8,9,10,11 , demonstrating the effectiveness of this method. However, meta‐analyses have not indicated clearly higher effectiveness of either CRF or PRF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many centers apply these procedures to manage sacral pain. Publications on this issue have been collectively reviewed 8,9,10,11 , demonstrating the effectiveness of this method. However, meta‐analyses have not indicated clearly higher effectiveness of either CRF or PRF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No serious complications were reported after receiving treatment using the three techniques 93 . Another systematic review confirmed that PRF is less effective than conventional radiofrequency in reducing pain and functional deficits in patients with lumbar facet pain 94 …”
Section: Treatment Optionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…93 Another systematic review confirmed that PRF is less effective than conventional radiofrequency in reducing pain and functional deficits in patients with lumbar facet pain. 94 New application forms of radiofrequency are currently under investigation (eg, cooled RF and multi-tined electrodes). 95,96 Other treatment options…”
Section: Alternative Radiofrequency Administration Possibilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because in 3 randomized clinical trials of participants with LBP originating in the LFJ and other body structures, radiofrequency denervation combined with a standardized exercise program resulted in either no improvement or no clinically important improvement in chronic LBP compared with a standardized exercise program alone. Contreras et al 133 reported a systematic review, and they found 3 randomized clinical trials comprising 103 patients, all of which showed greater pain control and better functionality with cooled radiofrequency compared with pulsed radiofrequency. Rotstein et al 119 also proved the efficiency of pulsed radiofrequency which is effective for a short period after medial branch denaturing.…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%