Pulsed profile S-parameter measurements have been performed for decades but as measurement hardware characteristics have changed (in terms of resolution, dynamic range and basic data acquisition); there may be gains to be made in re-examining calibration and measurement details. One candidate area is with pulsed stimulus measurements where edge-related performance is of interest and there are many choices with regard to modulator position, levels of correction of the modulation dynamics and correction indexing. By timeindexing error coefficients as well as raw S-parameter data, in a phase coherent fashion, some improvement in the corrected results near pulse edges seems possible in a number of cases when resolution is high.