2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevmaterials.3.124601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pump-driven normal-to-excitonic insulator transition: Josephson oscillations and signatures of BEC-BCS crossover in time-resolved ARPES

Abstract: We consider a ground-state wide-gap band insulator turning into a nonequilibrium excitonic insulator (NEQ-EI) upon visiting properly selected and physically relevant highly excited states. The NEQ-EI phase, characterized by self-sustained oscillations of the complex order parameter, neatly follows from a Nonequilibrium Green's Function treatment on the Konstantinov-Perel' contour. We present the first ab initio band structure of LiF, a ground-state bulk insulator, in different NEQ-EI states and show that these… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
55
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(108 reference statements)
3
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3(b)], i.e., the core-level broadening immediately follows the buildup of excited carriers n which includes contributions from both excitons [39] and QFCs in the CB. In contrast, the core-hole line shape renormalization governed by the quasiparticle screening n QFC ν 2 shows a clear delay in buildup compared to γ and n. This is consistent with the prediction that the pump energy tuned to the excitonic resonance should favor the creation of excitons [40] up to a critical density [41], and can be explained by means of an excitonic Mott transition-the initial stage of the dynamics is dominated by excitons which subsequently break into a QFC plasma due to increased screening as well as many-particle renormalizations [41]. An estimation of the excitation density per layer, n ¼ 7ð1.4Þ × 10 13 cm −2 [28], used in our experiment indeed significantly exceeds the predicted critical excitation density of approximately 3 × 10 12 cm −2 [2], and is close to the density of 1.1 × 10 14 cm −2 reported for experimental observation of excitonic Mott transition in single-layered WS 2 [42].…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…3(b)], i.e., the core-level broadening immediately follows the buildup of excited carriers n which includes contributions from both excitons [39] and QFCs in the CB. In contrast, the core-hole line shape renormalization governed by the quasiparticle screening n QFC ν 2 shows a clear delay in buildup compared to γ and n. This is consistent with the prediction that the pump energy tuned to the excitonic resonance should favor the creation of excitons [40] up to a critical density [41], and can be explained by means of an excitonic Mott transition-the initial stage of the dynamics is dominated by excitons which subsequently break into a QFC plasma due to increased screening as well as many-particle renormalizations [41]. An estimation of the excitation density per layer, n ¼ 7ð1.4Þ × 10 13 cm −2 [28], used in our experiment indeed significantly exceeds the predicted critical excitation density of approximately 3 × 10 12 cm −2 [2], and is close to the density of 1.1 × 10 14 cm −2 reported for experimental observation of excitonic Mott transition in single-layered WS 2 [42].…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Henceforth we express all energies in units of ε g and choose U ¼ W=2 ¼ 1 [61,62]. The electronic system is coupled to a single (μ ¼ 1) phononic brancĥ…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the tr-ARPES signal is related to the transient spectral function [104,105] which in semiconductor or insulators can be evaluated using a steady-state approximation (provided that the carrier relaxation time is much longer than the probe pulse). In this context [106] the PSD diagrammatic construction may provide a powerful tool in the field of light-induced exciton fluids, whose incoherent plasma phase [105,107,108] and coherent condensed phase [96,[109][110][111][112][113][114] (B11)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%