“…In a wider academic context, 'myth' appears to be predominantly used in this latter meaning, as 'false idea', and often rather derogatorily: In titles of research articles myths are not merely falsified, rejected, or corrected, they are quite violently 'broken' (Rakover, 1986); 'busted' (Malhotra, Noakes, & Phinney, 2015); 'shattered' (Baird & Gangl, 2006); 'exploded' (Wiley & Harnischfeger, 1974); and 'punctured' (DeBoer, Seaver, Angel, & Armstrong, 2008).…”