2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.irle.2010.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Punitive damages and the recklessness requirement with uninformed injurers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 Our approach to modeling the agent's possible consistent misperception of the incremental likelihood of an accident while engaged in active transportation is motivated by a strand of the law and economics literature. See, for example, Bebchuk and Kaplow (1992), Posner (2003), Teitelbaum (2007), and Bhole and Wagner (2010). 10 The expected harm and risk-neutrality conceptual structure we have in mind is common in the law and economics literature, with the caveat that we are also not specifying either the probability of an accident occurring or the magnitude of harm should an accident occur as functions of the level of activity or of the level of precaution taken.…”
Section: The Baseline Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9 Our approach to modeling the agent's possible consistent misperception of the incremental likelihood of an accident while engaged in active transportation is motivated by a strand of the law and economics literature. See, for example, Bebchuk and Kaplow (1992), Posner (2003), Teitelbaum (2007), and Bhole and Wagner (2010). 10 The expected harm and risk-neutrality conceptual structure we have in mind is common in the law and economics literature, with the caveat that we are also not specifying either the probability of an accident occurring or the magnitude of harm should an accident occur as functions of the level of activity or of the level of precaution taken.…”
Section: The Baseline Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Our approach to modeling the agent's possible consistent misperception of the incremental likelihood of an accident while engaged in active transportation is motivated by a strand of the law and economics literature. See, for example, , , , and .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%