2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pupil Diameter Tracks Lapses of Attention

Abstract: Our ability to sustain attention for prolonged periods of time is limited. Studies on the relationship between lapses of attention and psychophysiological markers of attentional state, such as pupil diameter, have yielded contradicting results. Here, we investigated the relationship between tonic fluctuations in pupil diameter and performance on a demanding sustained attention task. We found robust linear relationships between baseline pupil diameter and several measures of task performance, suggesting that at… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
131
3
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
21
131
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We interpret this by suggesting that the change of visual cortical excitability induced by monocular deprivation [1, 4, 5] results in behavioral changes both during visual stimulation (as measured by binocular rivalry) and during rest (as indexed by pupillary oscillations). The tight correlation between psychophysics and pupillometry agrees with a growing body of literature showing that changes of cortical excitability can be accurately tracked by the variations of pupil size over time [21, 22] and our findings specifically agree with the observation that the change of pupil size (i.e., the first derivative of pupil diameter over time) is a better predictor than the raw pupil diameter [26, 54]. One limitation of the current study is the relatively small sample size ( n = 10); even though the correlation between the change in pupillary hippus and ocular dominance is strong (Rho = 0.95), further experimental work is needed to confirm this result in a larger sample of participants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We interpret this by suggesting that the change of visual cortical excitability induced by monocular deprivation [1, 4, 5] results in behavioral changes both during visual stimulation (as measured by binocular rivalry) and during rest (as indexed by pupillary oscillations). The tight correlation between psychophysics and pupillometry agrees with a growing body of literature showing that changes of cortical excitability can be accurately tracked by the variations of pupil size over time [21, 22] and our findings specifically agree with the observation that the change of pupil size (i.e., the first derivative of pupil diameter over time) is a better predictor than the raw pupil diameter [26, 54]. One limitation of the current study is the relatively small sample size ( n = 10); even though the correlation between the change in pupillary hippus and ocular dominance is strong (Rho = 0.95), further experimental work is needed to confirm this result in a larger sample of participants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In accordance with this idea, mental fatigue, inattentiveness, and mind wandering are often associated with small pupil dilation (Hopstaken et al, 2015a(Hopstaken et al, , 2015bUnsworth & Robison, 2015van den Brink, Murphy, & Nieuwenhuis, 2016). Note, however, that in the above studies mental fatigue is also associated with erratic performance (Hopstaken et al, 2015a(Hopstaken et al, , 2015b, mind wandering (Unsworth & Robison, 2016), and slow reaction times (van den Brink et al, 2016;Unsworth & Robison, 2015). In contrast, in our study, the decrease of pupil size was associated with errorless performance and a speed-up of reaction times.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Importantly, high RTV is present more so in TBI patients with focal frontal lesions as opposed to nonfrontal lesions (Stuss, Murphy, Binns, & Alexander, ). RTV also covaries with LC tonic firing rate (Usher et al, ) and prestimulus pupil diameter (Murphy et al, ; van den Brink, Murphy, & Nieuwenhuis, ) in simple target detection tasks.…”
Section: Initial Research Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%