2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-020-04718-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pupillary Responses Obey Emmert’s Law and Co-vary with Autistic Traits

Abstract: We measured the pupil response to a light stimulus subject to a size illusion and found that stimuli perceived as larger evoke a stronger pupillary response. The size illusion depends on combining retinal signals with contextual 3D information; contextual processing is thought to vary across individuals, being weaker in individuals with stronger autistic traits. Consistent with this theory, autistic traits correlated negatively with the magnitude of pupil modulations in our sample of neurotypical adults; howev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not the first case where we find that pupillary responses are independent of physical luminance and yet inconsistent with perceptual judgments (Benedetto and Binda, 2016; Turi et al, 2018; Pome et al, 2020; Tortelli et al, 2020, 2021). These inconsistencies were generally explained by calling decisional factors into the picture, as these may bias or add variability to perceptual reports while leaving pupil size unaffected (Tortelli et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…This is not the first case where we find that pupillary responses are independent of physical luminance and yet inconsistent with perceptual judgments (Benedetto and Binda, 2016; Turi et al, 2018; Pome et al, 2020; Tortelli et al, 2020, 2021). These inconsistencies were generally explained by calling decisional factors into the picture, as these may bias or add variability to perceptual reports while leaving pupil size unaffected (Tortelli et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…Our main time windows of interest lasted 500 ms (consistent with previous work [25, 74]) and started either at 2000 ms post-stimulus or at 500 ms post-response to capture the delayed peak in pupil responses (approximately 1000 ms) while ensuring pupil stabilization following luminance transitions (e.g., between the brighter stimulus screen and the darker grey response screen).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pupil dilation tracks with perceptual-decision uncertainty (Urai, Braun, & Donner, 2017;Joshi & Gold, 2020;Allen et al, 2016;Tortelli, Turi, Burr, & Binda, 2020;Satterthwaite et al, 2007;Zénon, 2019;Lempert, Chen, & Fleming, 2015) and depends on mechanisms separate from the instantiation of button presses. We thus used pupillometry as an objective physiological readout of intermediate processes to corroborate our interpretation of perceptual insight.…”
Section: Pupillometry Further Validates the Perceptual-insight Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous reports of reliable associations between pupillometry results and inter-individual differences in perceptual styles [47][48][49][50] motivated us to investigate the relationship between the effects of contextual information on pupillary responses and autistic-like traits measured by the Autism-Spectrum Quotient…”
Section: Contextual Pupil Response and Autistic Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results show that pupillary constriction typically re ects the interpretation of light in a scene, not just the amount of physical energy entering the eye, suggesting that pupillary responses can be informative about an individual's perception. Indeed, pupillometry has been shown to track inter-individual differences in perception, and it may even be more reliable than behavioral measures and other physiological responses [47][48][49][50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%