2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.91.195422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Purcell factor of spherical Mie resonators

Abstract: We present a modal approach to compute the Purcell factor in Mie resonators exhibiting both electric and magnetic resonances. The analytic expressions of the normal modes are used to calculate the effective volumes. We show that important features of the effective volume can be predicted thanks to the translation-addition coefficients of a displaced dipole. Using our formalism, it is easy to see that, in general, the Purcell factor of Mie resonators is not dominated by a single mode, but rather by a large supe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
116
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
116
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Equation (1) is similar to the standard laser condition [19] that determines the threshold value of N 21 , but with the cavity mode quality factor and volume replaced by their plasmon counterparts in metaldielectric system characterized by dispersive dielectric function ε(ω, r). While the plasmon quality factor Q is well-defined in terms of the metal dielectric function ε(ω) = ε ′ (ω) + iε ′′ (ω), there is an active debate on mode volume definition in plasmonic systems [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. Since QEs are usually distributed outside the plasmonic structure, the standard expression for cavity mode volume, dV ε(r)|E(r)| 2 /max[ε(r)|E(r)| 2 ], where E(r) is the mode electric field, is ill-defined for open systems [27,28,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation (1) is similar to the standard laser condition [19] that determines the threshold value of N 21 , but with the cavity mode quality factor and volume replaced by their plasmon counterparts in metaldielectric system characterized by dispersive dielectric function ε(ω, r). While the plasmon quality factor Q is well-defined in terms of the metal dielectric function ε(ω) = ε ′ (ω) + iε ′′ (ω), there is an active debate on mode volume definition in plasmonic systems [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. Since QEs are usually distributed outside the plasmonic structure, the standard expression for cavity mode volume, dV ε(r)|E(r)| 2 /max[ε(r)|E(r)| 2 ], where E(r) is the mode electric field, is ill-defined for open systems [27,28,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasmonic or highindex dielectric nanoparticles are frequently used for this purpose 1,2 . The multipole expansion provides insight into several optical phenomena, such as Fano resonances 3,4 , electromagnetically-induced-transparency 5 , directional light emission [6][7][8][9] , manipulating and controlling spontaneous emission [10][11][12] , light perfect absorption [13][14][15] , electromagnetic cloaking 16,17 , and optical (pulling, pushing, and lateral) forces [18][19][20][21][22] . In all these cases, an external field induces displacement or conductive currents into the samples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14) and reconciles the Purcell factor with the energy-like confinement definition of the mode volume [165,166]. Similar definitions should work for the effective mode area or length.…”
Section: Retarded Regimementioning
confidence: 92%