1984
DOI: 10.1021/ac00275a045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Purge and trap chromatographic method for the determination of acrylonitrile, chlorobenzene, 1,2-dichloroethane, and ethylbenzene in aqueous samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The percent recoveries are lower than those reported in the literature. 35,36 This can be attributed to the fact that commercial purge and trap systems use high purging gas ow rates (normally 40 ml min À1 ) and also use traps consisting of a short length micro-bore tubing packed with the granular form of the adsorbent material. Such traps at the cost of high pressure drops and high power consumptions can provide higher adsorption capacity.…”
Section: Microsystem Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percent recoveries are lower than those reported in the literature. 35,36 This can be attributed to the fact that commercial purge and trap systems use high purging gas ow rates (normally 40 ml min À1 ) and also use traps consisting of a short length micro-bore tubing packed with the granular form of the adsorbent material. Such traps at the cost of high pressure drops and high power consumptions can provide higher adsorption capacity.…”
Section: Microsystem Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%