2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11694-020-00430-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Purge-assisted and temperature-controlled headspace solid-phase microextraction combined with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry for determination of six common phthalate esters in aqueous samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mass transfer efficiency of multiphase systems is significantly improved at high temperatures [79]. Cooling the fibers allows them to maintain good absorption in a thermal sample environment [80]. To improve the extraction efficiency and capacity of the SPME device, new geometries of the sorbent phase were used, like SPME Arrow and thin-film SPME (TF-SPME).…”
Section: Headspace-solid Phase Microextractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mass transfer efficiency of multiphase systems is significantly improved at high temperatures [79]. Cooling the fibers allows them to maintain good absorption in a thermal sample environment [80]. To improve the extraction efficiency and capacity of the SPME device, new geometries of the sorbent phase were used, like SPME Arrow and thin-film SPME (TF-SPME).…”
Section: Headspace-solid Phase Microextractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate the performance of the current method, it was compared with some relevant reported methods [2,[33][34][35] in regard to the SPME fiber involved, the extraction time, desorption time, linearity, LODs, RSDs, recoveries, and the contents found in real samples for the determination of PAEs, and the relevant data are provided in Table S5. The results indicate that the extraction time of the current method (40 min) is shorter than that of MWCNTs@PS (60 min) and DVB/CAR/PDMS (60 min) [33,35], and comparable to that of the Graphene-Ti (40 min). The length of the desorption time is similar to that of the other methods.…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Fibers For the Spme Of Paesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a few reports [ [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] ], a generation of cooled SPME named cold fiber for extraction of the volatile compounds to increase the analyte distribution coefficient between the adsorbent and headspace sample was introduced. Recently, a distillation condenser, as a cooling zone, was applied to combine the headspace SPME with purge assisted [ 26 ]. The results revealed the approach of that method for more analysis of the volatile compounds with the lowest effect of the sample matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%