1986
DOI: 10.1021/bi00362a020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Purification and characterization of three distinct glutathione transferases from mouse liver

Abstract: Three distinct glutathione transferases in the liver cytosol fraction of male NMRI mice have been purified by affinity chromatography and fast protein liquid chromatofocusing. These enzymes account for approximately 95% of the activity detectable with 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene as electrophilic substrate. Differences between the three forms are manifested in isoelectric points, apparent subunit molecular mass values, amino acid compositions, N-terminal structures, substrate specificities, and sensitivities to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
66
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
7
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notwithstanding the difficulties in identifying classes of glutathione transferase in different species, it was recently noted (4) that the amino-terminal amino acid sequences of two homologous mouse transferases (15) showed extensive similarities to those of two homologous rat transferases (16). This finding prompted studies of the glutathione transferase isoenzymes in mouse liver (17) and in human tissues (7), as well as an attempt at interspecies classification ofthe multiple forms of the enzyme (18). The present report correlates enzymatic and structural distinctions and shows that glutathione transferases from several species can be assigned to three classes comprising isoenzymes with common characteristic properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notwithstanding the difficulties in identifying classes of glutathione transferase in different species, it was recently noted (4) that the amino-terminal amino acid sequences of two homologous mouse transferases (15) showed extensive similarities to those of two homologous rat transferases (16). This finding prompted studies of the glutathione transferase isoenzymes in mouse liver (17) and in human tissues (7), as well as an attempt at interspecies classification ofthe multiple forms of the enzyme (18). The present report correlates enzymatic and structural distinctions and shows that glutathione transferases from several species can be assigned to three classes comprising isoenzymes with common characteristic properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Glutathione transferases from human placenta (19), human liver (20), rat liver (21), rat kidney (14), rat testis (13), and mouse liver (17) were purified to homogeneity by procedures as indicated. Antibodies to purified transferases were raised in rabbits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, GSTs purified from rat and mouse livers exhibited selenium-independent glutathione peroxidase activity (19,22), indicating that the properties of catalytic sites between mammalian and microbial enzymes may be different. The cDNAs responsible for GSTs of corn (GST III [14]) and rat (Ya and Yc [21]) have been cloned, sequenced, and expressed in E. coli cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple GST forms have been described in the rat (Habig et al, 1974;Hayes, 1984Hayes, , 1986Kitahara et al, 1984;Tu & Reddy, 1985;Guthenberg et al, 1985), the mouse (Lee et al, 1981;Pearson et al, 1983;Warholm et al, 1986;Hayes et al, 1987) and man (Awasthi et al, 1980;Stockman et al, 1985). Both cytosolic and microsomal GST exist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cytosolic and microsomal GST from the mouse have been studied in several laboratories; the physical properties of the enzymes isolated by separate groups of .workers differ (Lee et al, 1981;Lee & McKinney, 1982;Pearson et al, 1983;Morgenstern et al, 1984;Warholm et al, 1986: Hayes et al, 1987. The reasons for the lack of consistency of results from different research groups are not clear, but they suggest that strain-specific variations in mouse GST might occur.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%