1982
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.2740330411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Purification and some properties of wheat germ lipoxygenase

Abstract: Lipoxygenase from the germ of bread wheat was purified to near homogeneity by a classical scheme. After extraction at pH 4.5 from defatted germ, lipoxygenase activity was precipitated by 40 % saturation (NH&S04 from a 25 % saturation supernatant.After dissolution in a phosphate buffer at pH 7 and extensive dialysis against this buffer, the extract was submitted to gel filtration on Ultrogel AcA 34. The final step of DEAE Sephadex A50 chromatography gave three peaks ( b , La and L3) with lipoxygenase activity. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The behaviour exerted by LOX in the FJ-SM beverage throughout the storage can be explained by two possible hypothesis: i) inactivation of enzymes could be reversible and the enzymes can recover their activity under certain conditions (Bahçeci, Serpen, Gö kmen, & Acar, 2005) or ii) the presence of different isoenzymes in the FJ-SM beverage, which could be more resistant to HIPEF process; therefore, they could increase their activity over time. According to different authors, there are apparently 3 to 4 isoenzymes of LOX in different vegetable products which differ in their thermal stability (Engeseth, Klein, & Warner, 1987;Hildebrand, 1989;Nicolas, Austran, & Drapon, 1982;Shiba, Negishi, Okada, & Nagao, 1991). Ling and Lund (1978) based on the presence of two isoenzymes groups with distinct thermal stabilities, observed that the heat labile fraction can inactivate rapidly whereas that heat-resistant cannot be inactivated completely.…”
Section: Peroxidase (Pod) and Lipoxygenase (Lox) Inactivationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The behaviour exerted by LOX in the FJ-SM beverage throughout the storage can be explained by two possible hypothesis: i) inactivation of enzymes could be reversible and the enzymes can recover their activity under certain conditions (Bahçeci, Serpen, Gö kmen, & Acar, 2005) or ii) the presence of different isoenzymes in the FJ-SM beverage, which could be more resistant to HIPEF process; therefore, they could increase their activity over time. According to different authors, there are apparently 3 to 4 isoenzymes of LOX in different vegetable products which differ in their thermal stability (Engeseth, Klein, & Warner, 1987;Hildebrand, 1989;Nicolas, Austran, & Drapon, 1982;Shiba, Negishi, Okada, & Nagao, 1991). Ling and Lund (1978) based on the presence of two isoenzymes groups with distinct thermal stabilities, observed that the heat labile fraction can inactivate rapidly whereas that heat-resistant cannot be inactivated completely.…”
Section: Peroxidase (Pod) and Lipoxygenase (Lox) Inactivationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…, 19 the cooxidation of b-carotene in a linoleate model system 11 and the inhibition of lipoxygenase activity. 20,21 Standards and compounds isolated from barley were used at 1 mg ml À1 and diluted between 20 and 200 times in MeOH. Each malt and barley extract was ®rst diluted in MeOH and named antioxidant solution.…”
Section: Antioxidant Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With conventional chromatography, three isozymes were reported for peanut lipoxygenase (Sanders er al. 1975) and for wheat germ lipoxygenase (Nicolas et al 1982). However, the number of isozymes varied according to the source and these differences could be attributed also to the chromatographic conditions and techniques used (Haydar et al 1975 chromatography, the degree of purification for pea lipoxygenase was 73-fold (Arens et al 1973) and 33-fold (Eriksson and Svensson 1970), for pea seeds lipoxygenase was 23.4-fold (Haydar and Hadziyev 1973) and for wheat lipoxygenase was 102-fold (Wallace and Wheeler 1975).…”
Section: Enzyme Purificationmentioning
confidence: 99%