ABSTRACIthen remained constant for several hours before increasing once again at the beginning ofthe next cell cycle (i.e. 10th h; midpoint ofthe period ofcell division). This step pattern could be changed to a continuous pattern of accumulation of carboxylase activity merely by increasing the light intensity to 1 100 ft-c and as a result doubling the growth rate ofthe synchronous cells. Because the increase in carboxylase activity could be blocked by cycloheximide (2.5 isg/ml culture), the increase in enzyme activity during the cell cycle was assumed to be due to de novo synthesis of the carboxylase. These aforementioned observations taken collectively were interpreted as indicating that the structural genes of this enzyme might be continuously available for transcription with their expression regulated by oscillatory repression (4, 8) as proposed for bacteria.In a later study, Sitz et al. (15) used actinomycin D to show that the cell cycle accumulation of RuBPCase activity in this organism was also dependent upon RNA synthesis. These workers also attempted to determine if changes in the rate of enzyme turnover (i.e. degradation) might be affecting the pattern of accumulation of the enzyme during the cell cycle. They showed that the concentration of cycloheximide (2.5 gg/ml) used by Molloy and Schmidt (14) was insufficient to inhibit total cellular protein synthesis. When the concentration of this inhibitor was increased to 12 ,g/ml of culture or greater, total cellular prqtein ceased to accumulate and the activity ofthe carboxylase decayed at a faster rate (t½ = 4.4 h) than the rate (t½h = 9 h) observed in the earlier study (14). In fact, because the enzyme decayed with the same half-life of 4.4 h at all times tested during the cell cycle, including the period of constant enzyme activity, it was concluded that enzyme synthesis and degradation occurred throughout the cell cycle ofChlorella. During periods ofconstant enzyme activity, a steady state was assumed to exist between enzyme synthesis and degradation. Thus, the structural genes encoding the subunits of RuBPCase appeared to be expressed throughout the cell cycle with changes in the rate of carboxylase synthesis rather than in the rate of degradation determining the time of accumulation of enzyme activity during the cell cycle.Several considerations made the conclusions ofthe aforementioned cell cycle studies difficult to accept. First, from a cellular energetics standpoint, it seemed unlikely that an enzyme, such as RuBPCase, representing 10% of the total cellular soluble protein (17)