1990
DOI: 10.1016/0264-410x(90)90176-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Purified chick-embryo-cell (PCEC) rabies vaccine: its potency performance in different test systems and in humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed some earlier studies have shown that Rabipur produced greater RvnAb response and greater protection in animal experiments when homologous virus was used as a challenge virus. 16,17 In spite of these observations, Rabipur has been found to be efficacious in preventing rabies in exposed individuals both by conventional IM and the ID routes of vaccination This new PCEC vaccine (Vaxirab-N) has been produced after successful adaptation of Pitman-Moore strain of rabies virus. The genetic stability of the strain was maintained during the adaptation procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed some earlier studies have shown that Rabipur produced greater RvnAb response and greater protection in animal experiments when homologous virus was used as a challenge virus. 16,17 In spite of these observations, Rabipur has been found to be efficacious in preventing rabies in exposed individuals both by conventional IM and the ID routes of vaccination This new PCEC vaccine (Vaxirab-N) has been produced after successful adaptation of Pitman-Moore strain of rabies virus. The genetic stability of the strain was maintained during the adaptation procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has, however, led to only limited numbers of proposals for actual replacement. So far, the modified antibody binding test (ABT) (Barth et al, 1981;Barth et al, 1990) and the single radial diffusion test (SRD) (Ferguson and Schild, 1982;Ferguson et al, 1984;Ferguson and Heath, 1992) were proposed as alternatives. Their use is restricted to GP measurement by polyclonal antibodies and is not applicable to adjuvanted vaccines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the variations observed in the outcome of mouse potency tests, but also for practical and ethical reasons, alternative methods for potency control should be sought. To date, limited information is available on possible alternatives for the actual replacement of the mouse potency test (2,3,10,11) that would be independent of laboratory animal use, which causes most of the aforementioned problems. The alternative in vitro methods that have been considered include the modified antibody binding test (4,5), the single radial immuno-diffusion test (12,13), and ELISAs (1, 21,22,23,29,31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%