Purinergic Receptors 1981
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-5816-6_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Purinergic Receptors in Visceral Smooth Muscle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…L-AMP-PCP (100 jiM) was completely resistant to degradation, and no breakdown products could be detected even after 60 min ( Figure 5). In the case of ATP and of AMP-PCP, somewhat less adenosine was detected after the longer incubation times than would have been expected from the corresponding breakdown of the starting materials (Figures 3 and 5), and this is presumably due to some uptake of adenosine by the muscle (Maguire & Satchell, 1981). ATP (100 tiM) incubated with Krebs solution alone for 60 min was completely unchanged, and there was no detectable release of nucleotides or nucleosides by the muscle after 60 min incubation.…”
Section: Degradation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…L-AMP-PCP (100 jiM) was completely resistant to degradation, and no breakdown products could be detected even after 60 min ( Figure 5). In the case of ATP and of AMP-PCP, somewhat less adenosine was detected after the longer incubation times than would have been expected from the corresponding breakdown of the starting materials (Figures 3 and 5), and this is presumably due to some uptake of adenosine by the muscle (Maguire & Satchell, 1981). ATP (100 tiM) incubated with Krebs solution alone for 60 min was completely unchanged, and there was no detectable release of nucleotides or nucleosides by the muscle after 60 min incubation.…”
Section: Degradation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The pharmacological actions of adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) on many smooth muscle systems may be complicated by the breakdown of ATP to adenosine, which is less active than, or in some cases has the opposite action to ATP (Burnstock & Brown, 1981;Maguire & Satchell, 1981). This complication has been partly overcome by the use of analogues which are thought to be more resistant to enzymatic degradation by the tissue, such as adenylyl 5'-(P,-ymethylene)-diphosphonate (AMP-PCP), in which one of the ester oxygen linkages between the phosphate groups has been replaced by a methylene linkage (Maguire & Satchell, 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…an interaction between them, whereby activation of ectonu cleotidase influences ATP-receptor binding, also cannot be ruled out. It has been proposed that the P2y-purinoccptor and ecto-ATPase are the same molecule [27,31]. This conclusion was based on the observation that most of the nonhydrolyzable ATP analogs are much less potent, on a molar basis, than ATP; thus, ectonucleotidase activity may be required for complete P2y-purinoceptor activa tion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential pharmacological complications produced by such processes are generally 2-fold: to convert the applied agonist to other chemical species which may be active as agonists or antagonists at the receptor under study or at other receptors in the tissue preparation and to reduce the concentration of the agonist available to interact with the receptors under study so that the applied agonist concentration does not reflect the active one. Although there are a number of reports describing effects at purinoceptors of the former kind (Maguire & Satchell, 1981), evidence for the pharmacological impact of the latter is limited (Welford et al, 1987). However, studies conducted in other receptor systems, for example adrenoceptors and muscarinic receptors, show that problems of this kind manifest as incorrect determination of agonist potency orders (Kenakin, 1980) and cause difficulties in the quantitative analysis of antagonist effects (Kenakin & Beek, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%