2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2106.07692
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Purity and 2-Calabi-Yau categories

Abstract: For various 2-Calabi-Yau categories C for which the stack of objects M has a good moduli space p : M → M, we establish purity of the mixed Hodge module complex p ! Q M . We do this by using formality in 2CY categories, along with étale neighbourhood theorems for stacks, to prove that the morphism p is modelled étale-locally by the semisimplification morphism from the stack of modules of a preprojective algebra. Via the integrality theorem in cohomological Donaldson-Thomas theory we prove purity of p ! Q M . It… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above theorem implies that there exists an embedding BPS r,m ֒→ H(p S * DQ M ss S (r,m) ) ⊗ L r 2 (g−1)+1 . The purity of the right-hand side is proved in [Davc,Proposition 7.20], so we obtain the claim.…”
Section: 3supporting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The above theorem implies that there exists an embedding BPS r,m ֒→ H(p S * DQ M ss S (r,m) ) ⊗ L r 2 (g−1)+1 . The purity of the right-hand side is proved in [Davc,Proposition 7.20], so we obtain the claim.…”
Section: 3supporting
confidence: 62%
“…In [Dava,Conjecture 7.7], Davison formulated a conjecture relating the BPS cohomology and the intersection cohomology of the moduli space of representations of preprojective algebras. Using an étale neighborhood theorem [Davc,Theorem 5.11] which is also due to Davison, this conjecture is expected to imply similar statements for the Dolbeault and Betti moduli spaces. Once this conjecture is established, it would be possible to prove the equivalence of two versions of the P=W conjectures via the BPS cohomology and via the intersection cohomology, and that the χindependence of the intersection cohomology of the Dolbeault moduli space would follow from Theorem 1.2 as long as gcd(r, m) = gcd(r, m ′ ) holds.…”
Section: Motivation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [BZ19] the authors proved the formality conjecture for semistable objects in the bounded derived category of a K3 surface, using Orlov's result on strongly uniqueness of the enhancement. In the case of cubic fourfolds and Gushel-Mukai varieties of even dimension, the formality conjecture follows from the general results in [Dav21]. Nevertheless, Theorem 1.2 could be useful to provide a direct and simpler proof of this conjecture in these cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The cohomology of M (n, d) has been extensively studied in the literature, especially under the assumption that n and d are coprime, namely when M (n, d) is smooth; see for instance [40,33,36,35,38,54,31,16,54,19]. Recently studies about the intersection cohomology IH * (M (n, d), Q) of singular Dolbeault moduli spaces have started to emerge; see for instance [26,27,48,50,51,49,14,13,43,64]. 1 From this viewpoint, the decomposition theorem for the Hitchin map is a key tool to investigate the intersection cohomology of M (n, d): it allows to decompose IH * (M (n, d), Q) into building blocks, which are cohomology of some perverse sheaves on A n .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%