“…Free/paid simulations (including virtual and augmented reality), videos, and other digital tools are certainly useful supplements for increasing classroom learning as well as equity, compensating for real-life obstacles to laboratory education (for example, pregnancy, disabilities, finances, pandemics, etc.). However, conventional wisdom and professional societies maintain that engagement and learning are fostered by personal, authentic, inquiry-based, hands-on experiences. − There is admittedly growing controversy around this position, and the financial, logistical, and liability burdens of providing chemistry students with laboratory experiences have in any case prompted an increasing number of K–12 and higher education institutions to replace wet chemistry with dry. However, although the lack of rigorous research on effective laboratory learning has increasingly received attention − (alongside the argument that poor lab learning may be more a symptom of the teaching skill and/or course design in general rather than an inherent flaw in the concept of lab-based learning), − as well as the emergence of literature showing that virtual experiences can achieve many (but not all) of the same learning objectives, − there is currently still no perfect substitute for personal, authentic, inquiry-based, hands-on experience in the laboratory.…”